The Hoffman Wire: Nov. 17, 2000

Inside the Election
Disrupting the cryptocracy's old ball game

by Michael A. Hoffman II

With all the hoopla about the election, the Florida recount and so forth, some of my correspondents are wondering whether this crisis is a contrived distraction.

Certainly it pays limited dividends to the Establishment as a distraction, in so far as it detracts attention from the escalation of Israeli atrocities against Palestinian civilians. But otherwise the Florida impasse is indeed an authentic crisis for the oligarchy, because it represents a split in their ruling coalition.

Fanatic Bolshevik and Jewish-Likud renegades within the Democrat Party, desperate to elect a crypto neo-Communist like Gore, and a Learned Pharaoh of Khazaria like Lieberman, have disobeyed the cooler masonic heads who had cut a backroom deal.

My sources indicate that the election scenario was supposed to unfold this way: the Establishment agreed in advance to give Bush the election in order to consolidate the revolutionary gains made under Clinton, without putting Americans in a vigilant or fighting mood. Bush will take the nation down the Judeo-Masonic highway to hell at 45 m.p.h. Gore would have taken it at 90 m.p.h. The cryptocrats chose a George W. Bush presidency. The Democrats were to receive major concessions in return, including a US Senate majority thanks to gaining a seat from Washington state, which now, with the scrutiny on election fraud, looks as though it will fall through. (Note: Wednesday 11-22 it was reported that Cantwell (D) had just taken the lead over Gorton (R) in the voting for Washington state senator, with all votes counted but a few thousand absentees--Dex)

However, the extremist Communist/Jewish wing of the Democrat Party revolted, and staged the South Florida coup d'etat now unfolding as I write. The core of the Establishment opposes this coup but the fanatics are not to be trifled with (their Israeli counterparts assassinated Yitzhak Rabin). Their power base is growing with the increasing idolization of Judaism in the American heartland, particularly on the Right. Leading conservative spokesmen, including the two Joes --Farah and Sobran -- both defended orthodox Judaism last month against the likes of Lieberman, pretending that the Democrat Party and its vice-presidential candidate do not mirror Talmudic principles and values.

Megalomania, whether in a Napoleon, a Hitler, an Ariel Sharon or Gore and Lieberman is a destabilizing force. Cooler heads among the masonic cryptocracy, as represented by President George Bush Sr., who attempted to harness and channel the Bolshevik and Jewish fanatic elements during his administration, understand this.

But the Skull and Bonesmen have to deal with the hot passions of Jewish fanaticism fueled by the "Bible Belt" belief that "Jews" are saved by their "divine" racial pedigree and are thus untouchable. When such immunity is conferred by the Rev. Billy Graham's son, by Steven Spielberg, by syndicated Dallas and Nashville newspaper columnists and by the whole corpus of "Nazi Holocaust" agit-prop, the subjects of this idolatrous worship go crazy with pride and break out of the "storied destiny" script, to rush for power without sufficient forethought or calculation.

I'm delighted to observe this stampede and the resulting disruption in the ruling class timetable and its formerly hermetically sealed elections. The Establishment is losing face in the eyes of the people. The big shots are looking weak, petty and divided.

Let's hope that in the aftermath of which ever Judeo-Masonic stooge finally usurps the leadership of our nation, we achieve real election reform: paper ballots, hand counted in the presence of local witnesses at the precinct level (of course one can't accurately hand count machine ballots, which were intended to be read by a machine). Vote fraud in Oregon and several other states this year deserves more sustained investigation and publicity. (New Hampshire still has paper ballots. Their elections are generally more honest. Buchanan won the 1996 presidential primary in New Hampshire).

If you're voting with a machine, the so-called "margin of error" is great. I don't care what sort of voting machine it is, 1960s vintage or a year 2000 device. At present, computer voting systems have little accountability -- who oversees the programmers who write the software that supposedly counts the computerized votes? Software is extraordinarily susceptible to manipulation and data corruption. The media and Congress have until now shown little curiosity about this invisible,'Computer Wiz of Oz' process.

If the Founders of our Republic were correct when they said that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance, I'm grateful that Americans are a paying a bit more attention to this fascinating disruption of the cryptocracy's old ball game, than they are to Monday Night football.

Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of five books, including "Judaism's Strange Gods," published in September by Independent History & Research and now in its second printing. Order online at: http://www.hoffman-info.com/cgi-bin/store/commerce.cgi?item=83

The Hoffman Wire is made possible by donations from truth seekers.Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816-0849 USA

Copyright 2000 hoffman-info.com