The Slazon Report #112200
Solomon Revealed

The following excerpt from “The Outline of History” by H. G. Wells is an excellent example of what happens to petty glorified heroes when put in their proper place in the total fabric of history. The Old Testament, via the underhanded tactics of the rabbinical Mishpoche, has long been the dominant describer of lopsided history and layer of audacious claims, which is why we have such an ignorant, distorted and falsified record to draw from. There is no peoples on Earth that lie as completely, as blatantly, and as pathologically as do the followers of the “lord” of the Old Testament. The “lord”, as outlined in the Pentateuch, is A LIAR, was A LIAR and has come to his end as A LIAR.

Anyone with half a bean for a brain would know that an Entity capable of Creation...I mean CREATION! of something as magnificent as The Earth and all Divine Beings; Creatures great and small; and Plants beautiful and edible; would never stoop so low as to select someone as inferior and as weak-minded as Abraham to carry on the process. Give me a break people! Think about it! That would be like Bill Gates scouring the streets of the Tenderloin looking for a drunken bum* to bestow all his billions on. It jus’ ain’t gonna happen! There is only one “entity” I know of that is stupid and desperate enough to “choose” Abraham and that is Satan, the impostor, the swindler, the master conycatcher. (*My apologies to the unfortunate people, caught in the death grip of the demon alcohol, for using them in this way to illustrate my point. They are tragic examples of the works of Satan, and his followers, in their efforts to destroy authentic Human Beings.)--Jana

(begin)

“[But] the nature and position of their [sic] land was against the Hebrews, and their first king Saul was no more successful than their judges. the long intrigues of the adventurer David against Saul are told in the rest of the first book of Samuel, and the end of Saul was utter defeat upon Mount Gilboa. His army was overwhelmed by the Philistine archers.

“’And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in Mount Gilboa. And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour, and sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to publish it in the house of their idols, and among the people. And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth; and they fastened his body to the wall of Bethshan.’ (1 Samuel 31)

“David (990 B.C. roughly) was more politic and successful than his predecessor, and he seems to have placed himself under the protection of Hiram, King of Tyre. This Phoenician alliance sustained him, and was the essential element in the greatness of his son Solomon. His story, with its constant assassinations and executions, reads rather like the history of some savage chief than of a civilized monarch. It is told with great vividness in the second book of Samuel.

“The first book of Kings begins with the reign of King Solomon (960 B.C. roughly). The most interesting thing in that story, from the point of view of the general historian, is the relationship of Solomon to the national religion and the priesthood, and his dealings with the tabernacle, the priest Zadok, and the prophet Nathan.

“The opening of Solomon’s reign is as bloody as his father’s. The last recorded speech of David arranges for the murder of Shimei[1]; his last recorded word is ‘blood’. ‘But his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood,’ he says, pointing out that though old Shimei is protected by a vow David has made to the Lord so long as David lives, there is nothing to bind Solomon in that matter. Solomon proceeds to murder his brother, who has sought the throne but quailed and made submission. He then deals freely with his brother’s party. The weak hold of religion upon the racially and mentally confused Hebrews at that time is shown by the case with which he replaces the hostile chief priest by his own adherent Zaduk, and still more strikingly by the murder of Joab by Benaiah, Solomon’s chief ruffian, in the tabernacle, while the victim is claiming sanctuary and holding to the very horns of Jehovah’s altar. Then Solomon sets to work, in what was for that time a thoroughly modern spirit, to recast the religion of his people. He continues the alliance with Hiram, King of Sidon, who uses Solomon’s kingdom as a high road by which to reach and build shipping upon the Red Sea, and a hitherto unheard of wealth accumulates in Jerusalem as a result of this partnership. Gang labour appears in Israel[2]; Solomon sends relays of men to cut cedarwood in Lebanon under Hiram, and organizes a service of porters through the land. (There is much in all this to remind the reader of the relations of some Central African chief to a European trading concern.) Solomon then builds a palace for himself, and a temple not nearly as big for Jehovah. Hitherto, the Ark of the Covenant, the divine symbol of these ancient Hebrews, had abode in a large tent, which had been shifted from one high place to another, and sacrifices had been offered to the god of Israel upon a number of different high places. Now the ark is brought into the golden splendours of the inner chamber of a temple of cedar-sheathed stone, and put between two great winged figures of gilded olivewood, and sacrifices are henceforth to be made only upon the altar before it.

“This centralizing innovation will remind the reader of both Akhnaton and Nabonidus. Such things as this are done successfully only when the prestige and tradition and learning of the priestly order has sunken to a very low level[3].

“’And he appointed, according to the order of David his father, the courses of the priests to their service, and the Levities to their charges, to praise and minister before the priests, as the duty of every day required; the porters also by their courses at every gate; for so had David the man of God commanded. And they departed not from the commandment of the king unto the priest and Levities concerning any matter, or concerning the treasurers.’

“Neither Solomon’s establishment of the worship of Jehovah in Jerusalem upon this new footing, nor his vision of and conversation with his God at the opening of his reign, stood in the way of his developing a sort of theological flirtatiousness in his declining years. He married widely, if only for reasons of state and splendour, and he entertained his numerous wives by sacrificing to their national deities, to the Sidonian goddess Ashtaroth (Ishtar), to Chemosh (a Moabitish god), to Moloch, and so forth. The Bible account of Solomon does, in fact, show us a king and a confused people, both superstitious and mentally unstable, in no way more religious than any other people of the surrounding world[4].

“A point of considerable interest in the story of Solomon, because it marks a phase in Egyptian affairs, is his marriage to a daughter of Pharaoh. This must have been one of the Pharaohs of the XXIst Dynasty. In the great days of Amenophis III, as the Tel-el-Amarna letters witness, Pharaoh could condescend to receive a Babylonian princess into his harem, but he refused absolutely to grant so divine a creature as an Egyptian princess in marriage to the Babylonian monarch. It points to the steady decline of Egyptian prestige that now, three centuries later, such a petty monarch as Solomon could wed on equal terms with an Egyptian princess[5]. There was, however a revival with the next Egyptian dynasty (XXII); and the Pharaoh Shishak, the founder, taking advantage of the cleavage between Israel and Judah, which had been developing through the reigns of both David and Solomon, took Jerusalem and looted the all-to-brief splendours both of the new temple and of the king’s house.

“Shishak seems also to have subjugated Philistia. From this time onward it is to be noted that the Philistines fade in importance. They had already lost their Cretan language and adopted that of the Semites they had conquered, and although their cities remain more or less independent, they merge gradually into the general Semitic life of Palestine.

“There is evidence that the original rude but convincing narrative of Solomon’s rule, of his various murders, of his association with Hiram, of his palace and temple building, and the extravagances that weakened and finally tore his kingdom in twain, has been subjected to extensive interpolations and expansions by a later writer, anxious to exaggerate his prosperity and glorify his wisdom[6]. It is not the place here to deal with the criticism of Bible origins, but it is a matter of ordinary common sense rather than of scholarship to note the manifest reality and veracity of the main substance of the account of David and Solomon, an account explaining sometimes and justifying sometimes, but nevertheless relating facts, even the harshest facts, as only a contemporary or almost contemporary writer, convinced that they cannot be concealed, would relate them, and then to remark the sudden lapse into adulation when the inserted passages occur[7]. It is a striking tribute to the power of the written assertion over realities in men’s minds that this Bible narrative has imposed, not only upon the Christian but upon the Moslem world, the belief that King Solomon was not only one of the most magnificent, but one of the wisest of men[8]. Yet the first book of Kings tells in detail his utmost splendours, and beside the beauty and wonder of the buildings and organizations of such great monarchs as Thotmes III or Rameses II or half a dozen other Pharaohs, or of Sargon II or Sardanapalus or Nebuchadnezzar the Great, they are trivial[9]. His temple measured internally was twenty cubits broad, about 35 feet--that is, the breadth of a small villa residence--and sixty cubits, say 100 feet, long. And as for his wisdom and statescraft, one need go no further than the Bible to see that Solomon was a mere helper in the wide-reaching schemes of the trader-king Hiram, and his kingdom a pawn between Phoenicia and Egypt. His importance was due largely to the temporary enfeeblement of Egypt[10], which encouraged the ambition of the Phoenician and made it necessary to propitiate the holder of the key to an alternate trade route to the East. To his own people Solomon was a wasteful and oppressive monarch, and already before his death his kingdom was splitting, visibly to all men[11].

“With the reign of King Solomon the brief glory of the Hebrews ends; the northern and richer section of his kingdom, long oppressed by taxation to sustain his splendours, breaks off from Jerusalem to become the separate kingdom of Israel, and this split ruptures that linking connection between Sidon and the Red Sea by which Solomon’s gleam of wealth was possible. There is no more wealth in Hebrew history. Jerusalem remains the capital of one tribe, the tribe of Judah, the capital of a land of barren hills, cut off by Philistia from the sea and surrounded by enemies.

“The tale of wars, of religious conflicts, of usurpations, assassinations, and of fratricidal murders to secure the throne goes on for three centuries. It is a tale frankly barbaric. Israel wars with Judah and the neighbouring states; forms alliances first with one and then with the other. The power of Aramean Syria burns like a baleful star over the affairs of the Hebrews, and then there rises behind it the great growing power of the last Assyrian empire. For three centuries the life of the Hebrews was like the life of a man who insists upon living in the middle of a busy thoroughfare, and is consequently being run over constantly by omnibuses and motor-lorries.” (pp. 225-229)
--H.G. Wells “The Outline of History” (Garden City Publishing Co., Inc. 1930)

1. David’s last request is that his son Solomon commit fratricide. Solomon agrees to murder his own brother on behalf of his father. This is the Cain and Abel situation all over again. It should be obvious now who instigated the first murder of brother by brother. It was none other than the father of Cain and Abel! Just because most people think of this murderous “father” as God doesn’t make it so. Satan is the “lord” of murder among other things.

2. “Gang labour appears in Israel.” In other words, slaves appear in Israel. Slavery, as you well know, is sanctioned by the “lord” of the Old Testament, the Talmud and even the Jew Paul in the New Testament. It was NEVER sanctioned by Jesus or John the Baptist.

3. [The] “priestly order has sunken to a very low level” as witnessed even in Solomon’s time. It has never been any different, even today, because it was never based on anything worthy in the first place. Everything the followers of the “lord” of the Old Testament possess they stole from others. Even Wisdom, once in their possession, became unrecognizable due to the fact that their belief system corrupts everything it comes in contact with. Further, in their ignorance, they failed to understand that you cannot STEAL Wisdom because if you are Wise you do not steal!

4. “The Bible account of Solomon does, in fact, show us a king and a confused people, both superstitious and mentally unstable, in no way more religious than any other people of the surrounding world.” Please keep in mind that Solomon also worshipped Moloch, the so-called “god” who had a voracious appetite for children.

The following two excerpts are taken from a work titled: “The Lunatics of Zion”. The information itself comes from Jewish sources.
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/mental.htm

“The Jews are more subject to the diseases of the nervous system than the other races [sic] and people among which they dwell. Hysteria and Neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among Jews have gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthemic and hysterical ... As regards Austria and Germany, the same neurotic taint of Jews has been emphasized by Kraft Ebing, who states that nervous diseases, and especially neurasthenia, effect the Jews with exceptional severity ... Biswanger, Erb, Jolly, Mobius, Lowenfield, Oppenheimer, Fere, Charcot, Bauvet and most of the other specialists in nervous diseases, speak of this in their monographs on neurasthenia and hysteria in the male which is so rare on other races, is quite frequent among the Jews ... The education of the Jews must not be forgotten when studying their nervousness ... He begins at a quite early age to spend the greater part of the day in studying the Bible and Talmud, is also an important factor in the production of nervousness among the Jews.”
--JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, Vol IX, 1902 edition, under “Nervous Diseases”.

“This Land [Israel] draws lunatics in like a magnet. If we could build a roof over it, we had a lunatic asylum.”
--Gad Granach, Jewish artist in Der Spiegel, Nr. 5/1998, p. 163:

5. “...a petty monarch as Solomon could wed on equal terms with an Egyptian princess.” This is evidence of the decline of Egypt due to the Hyksos invasion. Hyksos were the so called “shepherd kings” (aka nomadic Hebrews) and were eventually run out of Egypt by the heroes Atmose and Kamose which is where the fictitious character of Moses came from. (Another stolen piece of history revealed!)

6. “There is evidence that the original rude but convincing narrative of Solomon’s rule, of his various murders, of his association with Hiram, of his palace and temple building, and the extravagances that weakened and finally tore his kingdom in twain, has been subjected to extensive interpolations and expansions by a later writer, anxious to exaggerate his prosperity and glorify his wisdom.”

This is exactly what happened. The Old Testament is filled with such exaggerations and glorifications but it never stopped because they have never stopped. Today the followers of the “lord” of the Old Testament are still up to the same old tricks. They exaggerate, they glorify, they falsify ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with themselves. They are masters of self-aggrandizement.

7. “It is not the place here to deal with the criticism of Bible origins, but it is a matter of ordinary common sense rather than of scholarship to note the manifest reality and veracity of the main substance of the account of David and Solomon, an account explaining sometimes and justifying sometimes, but nevertheless relating facts, even the harshest facts, as only a contemporary or almost contemporary writer, convinced that they cannot be concealed, would relate them, and then to remark the sudden lapse into adulation when the inserted passages occur.”

This is a very astute statement using ordinary common sense. Whatever history they know they cannot cover up they proclaim but do it in such as was as to cast themselves in the role of heroes even if the role itself is a murderous one! Can you imagine? But can you imagine how many Christians are taken in by this epic hornswoggle? Tragic indeed.

8. “It is a striking tribute to the power of the written assertion over realities in men’s minds that this Bible narrative has imposed, not only upon the Christian but upon the Moslem world, the belief that King Solomon was not only one of the most magnificent, but one of the wisest of men.”

Recommended reading: TTR THE WHAT? OF SOLOMON?

9. “Yet the first book of Kings tells in detail his utmost splendours, and beside the beauty and wonder of the buildings and organizations of such great monarchs as Thotmes III or Rameses II or half a dozen other Pharaohs, or of Sargon II or Sardanapalus or Nebuchadnezzar the Great, they are trivial.”

If all we had to draw from was the Old Testament, we would be forced to believe such drivel. Fortunately history has not been obliterated. There is ample evidence of true greatness still standing today that, by its very presence, accuses the authors of the Old Testament of lying.

10. “His [Solomon’s] importance was due largely to the temporary enfeeblement of Egypt...”

11. “To his own people Solomon was a wasteful and oppressive monarch, and already before his death his kingdom was splitting, visibly to all men.”

“The Truth about King Solomon is he was a lustful, perverted sex maniac with ONE THOUSAND sexual slaves. He brought much evil down upon himself and was a terrible evil man with a lot of wealth and a lot of power. He was totally corrupt.”
--TTR THE WHAT? OF SOLOMON?

And I haven’t even touched on the subject of the secret ingredients in his building projects. Here’s a question. Why do you think he needed so many sexual partners? Here’s the answer. THEY HAVE BABIES as in BLEMISHLESS INFANTS. Now who do you suppose has a voracious appetite for children? MOLOCH!

One final item. I advise Israel to get busybusybusy making amends. The jig is REALLY up. I suggest you start with the Palestinians and the Egyptians and work your way around the world. CLEAN UP THIS MESS! UNDO ALL THE DAMAGE YOU HAVE DONE AND BE QUICK ABOUT IT.

“This ain't no party, this ain't no disco,
This ain't no fooling around
No time for dancing, or lovey dovey,
I ain't got time for that now...”
--Talking Heads “Life During Wartime” Stop Making Sense

Jana Janus
Omnipresent