Wall Street's "Opinion Journal":

In my opinion, Clinton's "peacemaking" needs to be expanded to 'multidimensional peacebuilding' - a consideration of global issues such as climate; infectious disease and harm reduction in the peace process as globalization has replaced the Cold War.

Watch to see is this happens, which I actually doubt, at the upcoming summit in Egypt. It probably won't because, compared to the military industry, the peacebuilding industry is anemic.

All these local wars since World War II are failures of a poorly conceived peace process and can be traced to an emerging New World Order based on collapsing global economies. I do think the conspiracy theorists may be correct about trilateralism and an eventual one world currency dictated by very few.

Is S. Daniel Abraham a Bilderberg wannabe?

Can 'multidimensional peacebuilding' become secret Bilderberg agenda?

Could this be an improvement, in the long run, to the current peace process?

Your article (1) is slanted against Clinton but it didn't ask about any future for peacebuilding - typical of criticism without potentially constructive solutions.

And you may want to talk to President Jimmy Carter:

In Friday's New York Times, former President Jimmy Carter wrote, "An important principle in negotiation is for the mediator to maintain at least the semblance of neutrality. Accolades for one side and condemnation of the other ...makes it very difficult to orchestrate future negotiation sessions."

Sincerely

Philip "Rick" Henika