TWO BOOKS TO SAVE OUR NATION

The week beginning October 15 will see the release of two books by
Barry Chamish. Both finally and truthfully explain why Israel is now at war
and why the current government cannot win it.

The Last Days Of Israel, Zionist Book Club, Jerusalem.

In May 1992, Shimon Peres sent a letter to the pope promising him UN
control of the Old City of Jerusalem by the year 2001, with the Vatican in
charge of the holy sites. This letter was exposed by such newspapers as La
Stampa, Haaretz and Chadashot. According to the deliverer of the letter,
the French intellectual Marek Halter, this plan was included in the secret

clauses of the Oslo Accord. Arafat agreed to the internationalization of
Jerusalem with the understanding that the UN would permit him to establish
his state capital in the city.In the past month it has become clear to him
that Jerusalem would not become his, thus inciting him into murderous
action.

To assure that the ultimate plan was put into effect, the leaders of
Israel (Rabin, Netanyahu, Barak) were groomed and financed by an
organization called the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) in America,
and, in the case of Shimon Peres, by the French government and its Vatican
allies.

The goal of both sides is to create a New World Order on the ashes of
the old order. The year 2001, the start of the new millennium, was chosen
to bring in the new order with war in Israel, accompanied by a worldwide
financial collapse. Kosovo was merely a dry run for the fateful, if not,
final conflict over Jerusalem.

At the moment, Ehud Barak is being warned by his masters not to
utilize Israel's army in strength to defend the nation or he will face the
same fate as Yitzhak Rabin.

Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin - The new edition, Brookline Publishers, Boston

Already in its seventh Hebrew edition in just a year, this book is
changing Israeli history, because, using leaked court, hospital and police
records, the author indisputably proves that the convicted murderer, Yigal
Amir, could not physically have done the deed. In the new American edition,
the real murderer is named.

On October 20, 1995, Rabin announced that he had enough of "peace" and
in a raucous meeting at the UN headquarters in New York, told Clinton,
Ross and Christopher that he was not going on with the process. Rabin had
signed his own death warrant and must have known it. Barely a week before
the murder, Shimon Peres and Yossi Beilin signed the Abu Dis agreement,
dividing Jerusalem, in Paris and the French stepped into the vacuum, giving
the go-ahead for the assassination with the goal of putting their agent
Shimon Peres into power.

The new edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin, outlines Peres's role
and proves how a peace process, which was a deliberate war process, has
been based on cold-blooded murder from its inception.

To order:

The Last Days Of Israel - In America and the UK call, toll free 1 877
RABINYY. In Israel call, 02 6723703. Or send 50 shekels ($15) to POB
10182, Jerusalem, Israel 91101. Write perkins@netvision.net.il

Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin - In America call 1 800 666 BOOK.
Write brooklinebks@delphi.com

Lest anyone doubt the author's methods or conclusions, following is one of
the new chapters of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin.

AT LONG LAST: RABIN'S THIRD WOUND PROVEN

November 1998. It had been a good eighteen months since the last
hidden documentation about the Rabin assassination had been uncovered.
Since then some serious evidence had emerged about the political side of
the murder. A year before, the government released some sections of the
previously closed Shamgar Commission findings which incriminated Avishai
Raviv far more deeply in widespread crimes of provocation. Two months
later, one former Eyal activist, Benny Aharoni signed a sworn statement to
Knesset Member Michael Eitan, that under orders from Raviv, he phoned three
dozen reporters and delivered the infamous "We Missed But We'll Get Rabin
Next Time" message, well before the shooting was announced on the Israeli
media. And journalist Adir Zik had gathered powerful evidence of Carmi
Gillon's complicity in the murder.

But the tap had shut tight on any new medical, police or forensic
documentation. It looked as though the evidence I had collected for this
book would be the last of the proofs that Yigal Amir had not shot fatal
bullets into Rabin. The strongest evidence was the testimony of Police
Chief Lieutenant Baruch Gladstein proving that Rabin was shot point blank
and Dr. Mordechai Guttman's surgeon's notes describing a frontal chest
wound which passed through the lung before shattering the vertebrae at
D5-6.

When this book was written I had read Guttman's full surgical report,
which included the description of three gunshot wounds and the publicly
released procedural summation of November 5 which removed the frontal chest
wound and shattered spine. Thus, it was Dr. Guttman's written word from the
night of the murder versus his altered version of events, co-authored with
Drs. Kluger and Hausner, the next day. Whenever Dr. Guttman was confronted
with his report of the chest wound on the murder night, he answered that he
had mistaken Rabin's ribs for his spine.

If so, that Dr. Guttman couldn't tell the difference between ribs and
the spinal column, as one doctor attending a lecture of mine told the
audience, he should be disbarred from ever practising medicine again.
However, another doctor did give Dr. Guttman the benefit of the doubt: if
the bullet shattered the vertebrae at the point where the ribs join the
spine, such a mixup was both logical and understandable.

The main problem was that we were missing reliable descriptions of
Rabin's condition before and after the doctors went to work on him. Dr.
Guttman's report of a frontal chest wound lacked overall perpective and
seemed an oddity that could be sloughed off with the explanation that he
was mistaken when he wrote it.

In early December, American filmmaker Peter Goldman arrived in Israel
with the intention of gathering the evidence needed to justify raising
funds for a full length documentary based on my book. I gave him my
contacts, who were new to him and we shared one contact in common. I
expressed the opinion that visiting him would be a waste of time. I had a
meeting with him a year and a half before and followed it up with two phone
calls. It was all for naught; this contact had not provided me with any new
evidence. Undaunted, Peter met him anyway and was well rewarded for
following his instincts.

Just a few hours before departing the country, Peter presented me with
three new documents. I immediately understood that they were the final
pieces of the puzzle. We now had a complete diary of Rabin's treatment at
Ichilov Hospital.

Document one was the initial visual diagnosis of Rabin by Dr. Guttman.
Hastily written in English, the diagnosis reads, "GSW Abdomen and Chest":
Gunshot wounds to the abdomen and chest.

When I read the word chest, I thought I had found the smoking gun. Rabin
arrived with a chest wound. Amir never shot him in the chest. Case closed.
I would have to change my book. There were only two wounds, not three.
There was no third shot in the hospital. Rabin was shot in the chest in the
car.

However, within a few days, two experts set me straight. A chest wound
can also begin from the back if the bullet travels forward and injures the
chest.

Page two was far more detailed. It begins with a description of Rabin's
first bodily examination and provides us with indisputable proof of Rabin's
condition immediately after he was placed on the examination table.

Page three was the summation of the operation. At last, we no longer had
to depend on the public summation of November 5 to understand the cause of
Rabin's death.

I now had the whole story in hand and it was told in the following
reports:

1. First diagnosis

2. First bodily examination

3. Surgical procedure

4. Operation summation

5. Altered public summation

By the time I had completed my book, I had read 3 and 5. Four months
after the book was released, I received 1, 2 and 4. And to my great relief,
they confirmed my thesis conclusively. The documents, though not lengthy
nor wordy are surprisingly complicated and packed with information which
can be interpreted in different ways. Nonetheless, one piece of information
cannot be disputed: Rabin's first chest wound cannot possibly be the same
one which Dr. Guttman described on the last page of his surgical procedure
report.

As recalled, Guttman operated on a wound beginning in the upper lobe of
the right lung, which exited the lung in the direction of Dorsal Vertebrae
5-6, leaving a 2.5-3 cm. exit wound in the lung before shattering the
vertebrae. That is the wound Rabin ended up with.

Here is the wound he arrived with. According to the newly uncovered
first bodily examination report, Rabin's chest wound was caused by, "an
entrance wound in the area of the right shoulder blade which lodged under
the skin in ICS3 at MCL 3-4." Translated: The bullet entered the right
shoulder blade and took a straight line path to Intercostal Space 3 at
Midclavicular line 3-4. Simplified: The bullet went from the right shoulder
blade to just below the right nipple. Dr. Guttman could not have mixed up
the ribs and the spinal column because this bullet was lodged in the
mid-section of the ribs, almost as far from the spine as is possible.

I received a detailed explanation from a physician who had the foresight
to bring visual aids in the form of largescale skeletal charts. In report
3, Dr. Guttman does indeed begin the operation with procedures to treat a
rear chest wound. And Rabin responds. His pulse returns to 130, his blood
pressure to 90. Then without explanation as to why, his pulse drops to 60,
his blood pressure also to 60 and then all vital signs disappear from the
monitor. It is at this point that Dr. Guttman suddenly operates on a
frontal chest wound which shatters the backbone.

The physician explained, "It's as if that wound came out of nowhere. The
patient's vital organs had stopped functioning and other procedures were
called for. There was no reason to begin a new operation, unless there was
a new wound."

The physician then tried every hypothetical bullet path to match the
frontal chest/spine wound Dr. Guttman finally operated on, with the rear
chest wound Rabin arrived with, as described in documents 1 and 2. Even
with the most deft of contortions, the wounds didn't match. In order for
one bullet to do all the damage described in reports 1, 2, and 3, it would
have to take the following journey: Amir would have had to have shot Rabin
in a near straight line from the side, not the back, something he did not
do. The bullet would have entered the shoulder blade and carried on to the
upper lobe of the right lung, switching directions to go down to Dorsal
Vertebrae 5-6, which are in the mid-back. Then it would have had to have
shattered the vertebrae and been deflected upward, entering and exiting the
lung again before lodging just below the skin in the area of the right
nipple.

The physician concluded, "If that was so, and I add that it most
certainly wasn't so, why was the first diagnosis a straight line back to
chest wound and why didn't Dr. Guttman report the two additional lung
punctures? Even if somehow one bullet caused these two wounds, it was
incumbent on the surgeon to accurately describe the damage."

Finally, all THREE of Rabin's wounds were revealed.

The first two wounds, to the chest and abdomen occurred before Rabin's
arrival. The third, frontal chest wound, had to have been inflicted after
he entered the hospital.

Of the second wound, the bullet entered the abdomen via the left flank.
Dr. Guttman failed to notice another rather important detail as we shall
soon see.

We now examine report 4, and what a tale it tells. The operation is now
over and the surgical team writes its conclusion of their very busy night.
And what a latented team it was. Department Heads all. No longer is Dr.
Guttman the sole witness to the night's events. Though he writes the
summation, it is witnessed by Drs. Kluger and Yaacovitz, anaethesiologist
Dr. Ostrovski and nurses Evelyn and Svetlana. Svetlana, co-signs the report
and adds signed confirmation, finally, of Dr. Guttman's surgical
procedures.

Let's begin easy. At the bottom of the page are the times of the whole
night's events. Rabin was received at 22 hours, on the table at 22:05,
under anaesthesia at 22:10, operated on beginning at 22:15 and ending at
23:30. The problem here is that Rabin's death was officially announced at
23:20. We'll assume for now that the clock was wrong in the operating
theater.

The real story is at the top of the page. First, it goes a long way to
confirming the laboratory conclusions of Chief Lieutenant Gladstein by
noting that Rabin was shot from close range. Next, in report 1, we read
that Rabin was admitted with gunshot wounds to the chest and abdomen. By
report 4, some new wounds seem to have been added. The major wounds are
still GSW to chest and abdomen. But now four secondary wounds are added in
English. They are:

GSW to right lung

laceration of spleen

hemorrhagic shock

spinal shock?!

Dr. Guttman added the question and exclamation marks for emphasis,
apparently indicating that this was the final cause of death. At least,
that's what the physician and an IDF officer from the medical corps both
guessed. Laceration of the spleen and hemorrhagic shock were likely
internal wounds caused by the shot to the flank.

However, the first and last wounds are highly problematic, as the
physician explains. "First, you must accept that unlike the nearly
conclusive evidence of two chest wounds that we examined before, this
document is open to much more interpretation. Still, some really bothersome
questions should be asked.

"Let's look at the secondary gunshot wound to the lung. Why would the
doctors have even mentioned it? They reported a major gunshot wound to the
chest and that, except in the rarest of injuries, includes the lung. What's
the point of mentioning the lung wound again unless it came from another
gunshot?"

The Shamgar Commission examined these very same documents and asked the
same question. They were told that the second wound to the right lung was
caused by the bullet that entered the flank. It passed through the spleen
and stomach before lodging in the right lung. That is the official version
held by the Israeli government and accepted by the judges at Yigal Amir's
trial.

However the physician notes a fact the Shamgar Commission somehow
missed. In order for a bullet shot in the left flank to reach the right
lung, it has to pass through the left lung and most likely the heart. If
the doctors were so fastidious about noting a secondary wound to the right
lung, why didn't they record the entry and exit wounds that must have
occurred in the left lung?"

And now the biggest issue of all, spinal shock. Recall that the state
pathologist Dr. Yehuda Hiss conducted a limited autopsy on Rabin after Dr.
Guttman's team had completed its work and found no damage to the spinal
column. Recall also, that based on this conclusion, the Shamgar Commission
and the judges at Yigal Amir's trial concluded that Rabin suffered no
spinal damage. And finally, recall that the film of the assassination shows
Rabin walking after the shot to his back, an impossibility if vertebrae 5
and 6 were shattered as Dr. Guttman reported.

Well, now it's not only Dr. Guttman reporting spinal shock. It's also
five other members of his team. Would we could put them all in a courtroom
and ask each why they agreed to appear on a report which concluded that
Rabin died of spinal shock when the government of Israel's Justice Ministry
and courts insist he did not.

I asked the physician, can spinal shock be caused by something other
than breakage in the vertebrae or spinal cord? Perhaps a severe bruise or
shaking can cause spinal shock. "Out of the question," he replied. "Spinal
shock is the trauma resulting from a break or breaks in the spinal column.
The breaks can be in the outer vertebrae or in the cord, but there is no
other definition of spinal shock."

The physician made another poignant observation. "When the patient
arrived, the doctors did not record any symptoms of spinal shock. Again
this is possible but hard to understand. One of the first things doctors
look for in shooting cases is spinal shock. It's very easy to diagnosis.
When the spinal nerves are severed, the blood stops pumping naturally and
is forced downward by gravity. So, typically, the upper body is white and
the lower body, red. The victim was shot at 9:45 and examined at 10:05. You
would expect that twenty minutes after being shot in the spine, spinal
shock would be detected and diagnosed."

The physician was reluctant to let me hear what I was waiting all these
long months to prove. He would not say that the summation proved there was
a third shot at Rabin from the time he was admitted to Ichilov Hospital but
he stated, "If I didn't know who the victim was or the circumstances of his
death, I think I'd have to
conclude that the patient received another wound subsequent to his initial
admission. But I would advise you to stress your strongest points and they
are that two separate chest wounds are reported by Dr. Guttman and that it
is inconceivable that Rabin had no spinal damage. The six members of the
operating team were too skilled to have all been wrong about that."

There you have it. It is a certainty that Rabin suffered a frontal
chest wound and spinal shock, neither of which Yigal Amir could physically
have caused. But there is even more to the documents than just the
description of the wounds. There is confirmation of a vital vignette in my
book.

I recounted an episode told to me by Zeev Barcella, editor of the
country's largest circulation Russian-language newspaper, Vesti. On the
morning of the assassination he received a phone call from a Russian-born
operating nurse who told him, "The media is lying about Rabin's wounds. I
saw them. His spinal cord was shattered and they're saying it wasn't."
Ninety minutes later the nurse called Barcella back and with
well-remembered fear in her voice said, "I didn't call you before and you
don't know who I am." Then she hung up the phone.

The newly uncovered documents revealed new names to me of people who
were in the operating theater that night. The nurse's first name, Svetlana
and her signature were on the surgical summation. By comparing another
document I possessed, I discovered her full name, Svetlana Shlimovitz. I
found her phone number, introduced myself as best I could and had the
following short conversation:

"Svetlana, I would like to know what happened to Rabin in the operating
theater."

"How did you get my name?"

"You signed the surgical summation report."

"I don't work there anymore and I can never say what happened. Bye."

And she hung up. Barcella's story was true as well. As was my book. I
got it right the first time around.

end