'...In these times, there is a determinate need to establish a
global society with a global citizenry - one which has at
least one goal i.e. putting the brakes on a runaway; unregulated global economy. I think the conspiracy theorists are correct about the progression of a putative trilateralism and, after the collapse of trilateralism, I think we are headed toward a one world currency - the economic flow of which will be dictated by very few individuals (the Bilderberg - for example) in the initial form of a crony capitalism. And, my guess is that they
will implement a laisse-faire economy - an economy of individual paradigms of competition, greed and special interest.

Another goal of a global society would be to balance the
argument of good and evil - a counterresponse to directed
Doomsday prophecies in the time of the Millennium and,
personally, I call this response 'a renaissance of a
quantum nature' - a meld of science and spirituality which
actually uses an expanded knowledge of body, heart,

mind and soul to drive humanity toward an understanding
of the realities of human existance. There is a difference,
always, between what is thought and felt and what really
happens or what is finally done as "regime" (quote: George Soros). The need to reevaluate and reassess is paramount as we pass through the Millennium as there would be, I surmise, a hope for a 'Happy New Millennium', if you will. One of the hopes
of Cardinal Ratzinger, in response to the revelations of
the Third Secret of Fatima, was for an enhanced "human
conscience". I think the creation of a global society
should proceed from Gerry Brady's viewpoint ( bridgetothefuture.org ) as a responsible process derived from commitment; compassion; knowledge; calmness and respect.
"Peacebuilding" remains my favorite semantic.

In terms of what is really done, I do not offer wisdom but
I am offering a working hypothesis for what we all have
in common and that is that we are all dying beings and that
life is an illusion of a thinking and feeling human; a
construct, perhaps, of our own wonder and perplexity.
There is the null hyothesis, if you prefer it, that we are
living beings and that dying is the illusion. However, the
former working hypothesis is more in tune with what is
happening by the physical laws of the Universe that we
exist in - namely entropy and the expanding Universe.
The Chumash shamans, for example, consider self-destruction a sense. So, how do we deal with this putative reality and create a global society - a free world?

A free world, in my opinion, necessitates choice and the
responsibility for the path that choice leads. I am an
advocate of a principle of path-following - follow your
own path - but, please consider the value of critical
thinking. Einstein might have suggested for you to run
your own "thought experiments" and so, I did, but the
'experiments' that I ran, based on my curiosity regarding
quantum mind, were actually imaginings of the form and
substance of the paths themselves. Here lies the
reasoning that leads to a consideration of the human
"mass subconscious/perception" (quote: Gerry Brady) as something humans are actually reliant on for their own evolution. I think it changes the human perception; the thinking human's life
illusion of 'God Is'. I think it changes the human
perception/experience of what 'God Is' means to
humanity.

Consider yourself walking a straight line. Like a form of
static equilibrium, you can look to see your illusory
future (or you can have it pointed to you by "leaders")
and you can look behind you to see the origins of a
linear, dogmatic path. An example of this kind of path
could be laisse-faire economy or a person devoted to their
own paradigm of 'God Is'. Now, consider yourself
walking a curvature where the future is seen as uncertain as you
cannot see clearly your future or the basis for its origin.
This could be considered walking a "reflexive" (quote: George Soros) curve - the energies of doubt and optimism are combined. You are basically on a path of "near equilibrium" (quote: George Soros) if you expectations/aspirations are right (BOOM) or dynamic disequilibrium (quote: George Soros) if you expectations/aspirations are wrong (BUST).

In my opinion, there is another abstract path and that
would be the path of dimensionality - a path of a quantum
nature in which you are a point in the space/time
continuum - the origin and future move away so quickly
as proportionate dimensions that you can only stop and
wonder, based on feeling alone, that they even exist. In
this case you can only rely on the human "mass
subconsciousness/perception"(quote: Gerry Brady) and, yet, you can begin your search by inquiring; cooperating with other dying
humans as to its existance; its espirit de corps. What are
my fallibilities as they are the illusions of the thinking,
imperfect human? What are my attributes as they are the
illusions of the thinking, imperfect human? Can there be a
global society with a reliance on the "mass
subconsciousness/perception" (quote: Gerry Brady) as its origin? Can we connect all humanity; all civilizations in synchrony; in
time? Or, will we merely exacerbate our dying existance
as directed violence as but one proof of my hypothesis
which I repeat - we are dying beings as of now; life is an illusion as of now...'

Philip "Rick" Henika