http://pub8.ezboard.com/fchemtrailschemtrails.showMessage?topicID=1178.topic
Veteran Military Personnel Raise Key Issues of Concern:
Military - Civilian Airline Connections
_____
Hi,
If the airlines are in this up to their eyeballs, along with the Feds, then all bets are off. The FAA will have been tuned-up so the documentation issue goes away and with airline senion management there to manage the hangar floor. Also: many airline types are ex-military and/or active AFRES, ANG, etc., etc., so jerking their chain becomes a whole lot easier.
However, I suspect that this isn't exactly an "industry wide" project. That's too big a lid to keep on, even for the Feds. I suspect they have AN airline, and only part of it at that. Probably one with no foreign stakeholders to complicate things.
Cheers.
Bob
-----------
From Bob 5-24-00
Further to my last message (above) regarding military connections (and the chemtrail controversy), look at this very recent senior appointment at US Air.
Bingo.
http://www.usair.com/corporate/press/nw_00_0515.htm
Bob
------
Comment
On Ethics and Spraying the American Public From JhanDavis@_______ 5-24-00
During my 24 years sevice as an active duty member of the US Air Force, I was never asked to do anything unethical. I took pride in the fact that the word "ethics" still had some meaning in a government context. I also considered myself a part of our government. Had I been requested to do something unethical I'd have resigned my non-commission on-the-spot.
I've been following the "chemtrail" controversy for a number of years now. It hasn't evaporated. Quite the contrary: it's maintained a unity and coherence unusual for the typical "urban legend." And it's spread. The human testimony can no longer be ignored. People on the ground are being dumped-on by people flying specially-outfitted equipment.
If any of your readers are facing the choice between doing unethical things to the American people or tendering a letter of resignation, I'm sure the right choice will be obvious. Don't sell your soul to the devil for a paycheck.
Nobody has the right to spray the American population without a vote on the matter. Nobody.
In my youth, the mosquito sprayer came through the neighborhood in the summer, and the funds to make that happen were a matter of public record.
There is no public mandate to spray the American people from airborne platforms. And anyone who is doing it qualifies as the enemy.
The way we handle this enemy is simple: Deny this enemy the funding required to do the job. Now here's where it starts:
Nothing is going to get sprayed in massive quantities without the chemical basis for the spray itself. This entails massive investment in plant, equipment and personnel, along with the contracting, procurement, and finally the transfer of a large amount of cash needed to make the logistics work. Where there's money changing hands in sufficient quantity, there you'll find the chemicals going the other direction. Just follow the money trail. Through a chain of handlers. Same with the chemical. Have you ever seen paperwork which looks like this? A subpoena can work.
My gut feeling is that this is not being done by our constitutional government. Which means that there is a government within the government, probably a very tightly-bound government-industry entity with no definable interface between the two. And it has access to all the money the real, elected government has. America, we have a problem.
http://www.sightings.com/general/stumble.htm
Edited by Bufford at: 5/24/00 7:31:55 pm
djembemon Global user (5/24/00 7:31:28 pm) Reply Interesting article, Bufford -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmmnnn...
Well, U.S. Air's "customers" ought to be its passengers.
However, if they're playing a semantics game in this release (and are possibly receiving money through some sort of clandestine spray program as has been identified in recent posts), then an entirely new meaning of "accountability" may have occurred...
This may not be the last such announcement. In fact, I would expect more if the posts are correct (as well as some suspensions, firings, etc.).
(NOTE: Earlier this week ezboard had a series of threads on all the $$$$ pumping through NOAA and NASA on aerosol research, including links to NOAA and NASA sites with C-130 flight plans and mission statements.)
