(Thanks, I. :)
Reader I. sends us:
"Send it anywhere you like! Please put my e-mail address on it if you do. -Dragon"
(e-mail: captaindragonfarstar at yahoo dot com)
"There's more to this oil leak in the Gulf than meets the eye", I said to Joe. Ol' Joe Clark is the driver for the armored car service that picks up our receipts twice a week. The armored car was already loaded with our bags of receipts. We were sitting on the front porch, drinking a cold one. 'Just coasting until payday', is the way Joe described it.
"What is this stuff?", he wanted to know.
"A gift from our friends from out of town, They smuggle it in through the Neutral Zone", I told him. "There's a planet somewhere out there in the Ford galaxy where it looks just like the Rocky Mountains."
"Tastes like Coors."
"It's a vast universe. Full of wonders."
I don't think he bought my explanation.
I went on to share my thoughts about the
Fact: The controlled press is not hyping this event and using it as a loosh generator.
Fact: The controlled press is carefully avoiding placing the blame on any one person or any one company, even though BP's name is all over it. There are no bad guys that we are being driven to hate. This could have been passed off as a terrorist incident, but if they tried then it didn't work.
Fact: The incident itself happened at a particularly auspicious time of year for black magic. There's something about the transition period between Aries and Taurus that lends itself to dirty deeds done on a large scale.
Fact: The company is already known to the regulatory agencies and others as a company with a poor safety record. The company's poor safety record is a frequent topic of news reports, interviews of company employees, public records, and eyewitness testimony. The public perception is that the company, and that rig in particular, was an accident waiting to happen.
Now, let's pull all this together, I said to Joe. Given the history, if true, of the company's terrible safety record, what are the odds that the accident would happen on that particular date?
Ordinarily, when a company or a government commits an enormous blunder, the cover-up mechanism kicks in. The guilty persons, if ever identified, are quietly promoted or dismissed, depending on circumstances. Not in this case.
In this case, I think that the open admission of lax safety is part of the cover-up. It is much more preferable, perhaps, to be seen as incompetent than for the truth to be known. After all, those individuals who are being labeled as incompetent are mostly out of reach of the US regulatory and enforcement agencies. It seems that there are no barriers to the truth about lax safety and incompetent management and bad judgement. They are, it seems to me, using this to hide a larger truth.
The larger truth would be that this event was industrial sabotage done by a competing company or other hostile organization? Photos of the burning rig show a large hole in the helicopter landing deck. The fires are on the other side of the rig at the moment that the picture was taken, so the hole was not caused by fire. A laser beam, perhaps? More than one beam, since the hole in the helicopter deck didn't start any fire or cause major destruction. A different beam or beams did the real damage.
Whose beam was it? And why? The very existence of such a beam weapon would be secret, and part of what is being covered up. That, and the fact that a hostile force of some kind caused the destruction. That's a war we're not supposed to know is going on.
What was the destruction of the rig supposed to accomplish? Given the aftermath of the event, it would be reasonable to say that the Law Of Unintended Consequences was at work, and that the destruction went far beyond whatever they intended. We've already seen how difficult it is for the dark side to be successful now that the earth is operating at a higher vibratory rate. Combine desperation with a flat learning curve, and disaster is a natural consequence.
Joe broke into my explanatory narrative with this:
"What happens now? When and how will the hole in the sea floor be fixed?"
"Can it be fixed?" That's the real question, I responded. "And do we have the technology and the political will to fix it?"
I went on to explain. We already know that there are competing forces at work, at least two. David Wilcock says that it's the Rockefellers vs. the Rothschilds. True or not, let's go with that for the sake of having a name to use. Suppose that the technology to fix the leak exists and that it is in the possession of the Rockefeller faction, and that they're the ones who did the hit on the rig. The rig, of course, being British, would be a Rothschild asset. If what David W. says is true, the Rockie boys are fighting for survival and that is the reason that the rig was attacked. Collateral damage to a few miles
of shoreline or shiploads of birds is not going to be a factor they will consider.
To "fix" the leak right away would be to bail out one of the Rothschild assets. They won't be eager to do that. Their choice would be to wait until BP dies and floats ashore like one of those oil-covered birds. Clean-up? It can be done. Just another way of making money. They'll use BP's assets to pay for it.
Now, another possibility, I told Joe, is that there is no way that the human race can fix the leak. Given enough time, the leak will stop completely on its own. When the pressure of the ocean water is greater than the pressure of the whatever-it- is that's coming out, then the leak will close. Or, Earth, herself a conscious entity, will intervene on her own. Probably not until we have learned big lessons, though.
Joe was eying the chips, and I motioned for him to have some. "These didn't come through the Neutral Zone", I told him. "They're from the local supermarket. "
"I'm not too sure that this beverage did, either," was his reply. I reminded him that it is a big universe, full of wonders, and went on with my story.
As long as we're speculating, I told him, let's do some cosmic speculating. What if an even larger scenario is unfolding right in front of our unsuspecting eyes?
'Splain, he says.
O.K. What if this event is purposely being dragged out under cover of incompetency and fuzzy jurisdiction in order to maximize the impact? If the leak had been fixed and the oil contained right away, then the world's population, more to the point, the US population, would go back to their soap operas and ball games. Nothing more than regulatory reform would have changed.
Oil spills and oil contamination go on all the time. All sorts of environmental degradation and pollution and economic exploitation goes on all the time. We don't see it here, as the controlled press keeps it away. Oil contamination is a major problem in Nigeria, but since we don't see it, it's harder to get people excited enough to do anything about it. When the oil becomes a problem for American workers, and American coastlines, then we sit up and take notice. And if this event is being orchestrated in any way, the effect is that the oil problem, and for that matter, the whole energy source problem, comes up for attention. Enough people get hurt, enough coastlines get ruined, and the people are ready for an alternate energy source, or sources.
"You mean that this event is being orchestrated to achieve a certain outcome?", Joe asked.
I told him not to discount the possibility. One man in the White House is not powerful enough to change our energy policy. He only has about two years left before the next election. And even the ones who are nominally on his side don't always come through when needed. You and I have both experienced that situation, I reminded him.
What if, sometime later on this summer, maybe August, after the oil has become a problem that has affected our food supply and our economy and people are desperate for a solution; what if, I said, he, Obama, uses that as an opportunity to announce disclosure? The ETs appear with the oil problem solution and it's ready to use. The earthlings will be involved in the process of stopping the leak and cleaning up the ocean. The ETs will have proven that they are friends of earthlings, and with the earthlings working side by side with the ETs, bonds of friendship will form and the earthlings will see that the ETs look much like us.
Exotic friends from outer space! Yeah! They look just like us but with cooler gadgets. And the earthlings will listen, and things will begin to change. Seems to me that if they arrive and solve a big problem for the world, then they will have an easier time of being accepted than if the government announced on a slow news day that we have some friends we'd like y'all to meet.
Can't you just see the fear porn media spring into action? And the Armageddonists and other religious types. Scientists, too, would have their say. ET photos on the tabloids. ETs on 60 Minutes, in the Rose Garden at the White House. They would be a commodity, a celebrated commodity. Chaos.
Is this what Obama was thinking when he promised that the beaches would be restored? Is this why he appears to be totally unflappable, and even gets criticized for it? Does he know something that we don't know?
ETs to the rescue, just like the cavalry in an old John Wayne western movie! You've seen 'em. They come riding up over the ridge just as the settlers are running out of ammunition against those pesky Indians. In this drama, though, it's the darksiders who are the ones surrounding the settlers.
If the ET leader looks like John Wayne, the I'll know I've signed up as an extra in the wrong movie!
I looked at Joe to get his reaction. He was thoughtful for a long time.
"Logic tells us," he said in his Mr. Spock voice, "that there are two possibilities. One, you are correct. Two, you are crazy."
"Don't forget the third possibility" , I said to him.
"That both possibilities are correct."
Having found a point of mutual agreement, he said that it was time to get back to the shop. He was saying something about Rocky Mountains on a planet in the Ford galaxy as he drove off, but the engine's roar drowned it out. Soon he was gone.