On November 23, 2001, PSI TECH
http://www.trv-psitech.com/index.htm
has published article Out on a Limb: Remote Viewing the Crash of Flight 587
http://www.remoteviewing.com/news/flight587.html
in which they present aditional data that came out during the TRV session as the response to the compliments about findings that were given in their preliminary report
http://www.remoteviewing.com/reports/111201.htm
In it they have indicated that the cause was "mechanical infiltration." In other words, sabotage.
Based on the segment of the report, made by the NTSB, on content of the Flight Data Recorder that states:
.... the Airbus began a series of oscillations, yawing from left to right, then back again. A few seconds later and the data stream from the Airbus's rudder is torn off--the aircraft begins rolling to its left side --the flight data recorder shows that it rolled 25 degrees to the left, even though the pilot had applied full-right roll control. The recorder also reveals the aircraft had dropped into a 30-degree dive, and began revolving rapidly toward the left." ….
and consultations with several senior aerospace engineers, PSI-TECH now believes that there is one explanation consistent with the TRV findings and Flight Data Recorder data.
A sudden reverse of the thrust of the left engine, while the airplane was climbing under the full power, would account for all three events. It would cause the airplane to spin around its vertical gravity center axis (flat spin) creating a huge side force on the tail and rudder assembly, which simply broke off cleanly and fluttered away. Without the vertical tail assembly to slow the spin, rotation speed would further increase which would ultimately rip the aircraft apart.
Marshall Smith, the Editor of BroJon Gazette (BroJon.com)
http://www.geocities.com/brojongazette/index.html
in his article THE MYSTERY OF FLIGHT 587, that was published on November 15, 2001 and further updated on November 17, 2001, describes this same scenario in full detail and comes to the same conclusion. As Mr. Smith was a pilot since 1962 and holds degrees in mechanical and electrical engineering and physics and as he was working on failure analysis for NASA for many years, his opinion greatly empowers the conclusion that was made by the PSI-TECH
THAT WAS THE SABOTAGE.
As each TRV project requires a large amount of rigorous work made by professional remote viewers, there are capacity limitations related to the every day problem called resources managing.
Because of this a few pieces of raw data related to this target have been gathered that they have not time enough to investigate. These are:
1. Sabotage.
2. A man in a green uniform.
3. Fortran.
The details of the first clue are well explained in Marshall Smith’s BroJon Gazette article.
Second clue could indicate that the US Military are behind this operation.
Third clue was addressed by the PSI TECH with this comment:
…. (which we discovered afterwards is the software language used to control this type of "fly by wire" aircraft.) ….
FORTRAN is, for over the three decades, standard computer programming language in mechanical engineering field. It is the acronym of the term FORmula TRANslation language. It is used for the programming of the robots whose dynamics is prevalently described by the mathematical functions (formulas) like assembly line robots or fly-by-wire aircrafts designed in late ’70.
This is important finding because, if there are not hardware redundancies, or if they are but were tampered with, the change in the AIRBUS 300 program that controls all of it’s flight functions could start the reverse trust of one of the engines at the precise time/ event of the flight and block all logic that was designed to exclude such event during the flight to occur, regardless what the crew do.
This reminds me of 911 NY event also.
Best regards.
11-25-2001
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com
