Chilbolton "Schematic" image
Chilbolton "face" image
(view when standing ten feet from computer screen for best effect)
OUR COMPOSITE GRAPHIC:
On November 16, 1974 a digitally-encoded schematic was beamed from the Arecibo radio telescope on Puerto Rico. The power of the beamed message was equivalent to a 20 trillion watt omnidirectional broadcast, and would have been detectable almost anywhere in the galaxy. But it was aimed the third of a million star cluster M13, roughly 20,000 light-years from us, near the edge of the Milky Way galaxy. Even if anyone had been listening, the speed of radio waves are limited, so we should not have had a reply for 40,000 years.
But, on 17th August, 2001 two large and incredible images were imprinted on crops beside ANOTHER radio telescope - Chilbolton, near Wherwell in Hampshire, UK. In the style of the now infamous "crop circles", they are drawn by a mysterious flattening of the crop. One image depicts a replica of the schematic contained in that 1974 transmission. The other crop image is that of a humanoid face.
Either this is an incredible hoax or an incredible first contact reply.
The reply schematic is subtly different to the original that we transmitted in 1974. Fintan Dunne, co-editor of PsyOpNews.com, has decoded the reply by comparing it with the logic underlying the construction of our original schematic. Psyopnews.com has decoded the message. A full explanation of the analysis leading to this decoding follows:
The 1974 message was encoded into the radio waves by using two frequencies and shifting between them. The 1679 character message is in computer binary code (0 and 1). The number 1679 is the product of 23 and 73. Arrange the bit-code in 73 rows of 23 and this reveals the schematic picture encoded in the message.
PsyOpNews.com studied the published crop images from cropcircleconnector.com (who retain copyright). We flipped the image of the "crop-circle" schematic horizontally thru 180degrees -using Paint Shop Pro and then also mirrored it thru 180degrees. Then we could line it up with the published 1974 Arecibo schematic for comparison.
In another browser window, open our composite grahic
http://www.eionews.addr.com/images/chilbolton2001cropimages.jpg
That shows you both schematics, while you read on:
The top row gives the numbers 1 - 10 in binary notation (all the numbers in the schematic are binary).
The next row shows the atomic numbers of the key elements that make up life on Earth -- hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus.
The next four rows contain 12 groups or "blocks" of 5 numbers each, showing some of the key molecules that are made up out of these atoms -- the sugars, bases, and phosphate that make up the DNA.
In the Chilbolton ET schematic, these first six rows are exactly replicated --as much as we can be sure, given the fuzziness of an image drawn on a crop. Logically then, the ET is telling us:
"Hello Earth. We are replying to your message describing yourselves - which we have understood. We too are a hydrocarbon lifeform with a similar mathematics and logic."
Back to the Arecibo schematic. The round spiraling pattern above the human figure is a representation of the double helix of DNA, with the 4 billion base pairs in a human chromosome indicated by the numbers in the bar down the middle of the double helix. One and a half turns of the DNA helix are displayed.
By contrast, the Chilbolton schematic shows almost two and a half twists in the ET's DNA on one side only. The other side has one and a half turns like ours. The central bar seems to confirm they have the same number of basepairs as we posess in our DNA. The implication is that they are trying to say:
"However we have a slightly different DNA structure"
Below the DNA swirl, the Arecibo schematic had a cartoon of a human body. The number to the left indicates the population of the Earth; to the right is the height of a human.
Now it gets really interesting. Instead of a human frame, the Chilbolton schematic has a figure that looks like a cartoon baby with its head enlarged for cartoon-effect. How many ET's are there? The population number block is fuzzy -but seems to differ from ours. The height of the ET's is definitely different. We show almost entirely solid horizontal block - they show a block with a gap in the centre.
Just like a cartoon, the ET's are clearly exaggerating for effect. They are saying:
"We are smaller than you, with very large heads"
Back to the Arecibo schematic again. Underneath the human, we see a diagram of the Sun and planets in our solar system. Now, the third planet from the Sun (Earth) is above the line made by the others, indicating that this is the source planet of our message.
Compare the Chilbolton schematic. Just under the ET's tiny feet, we see three or four planets raised above the line. So they inhabit more of the planets in their solar system than we do in ours -indicating technological advancement.
But why the curious arc between the fifth and sixth planets? It's symbolizing that the sixth "planet" is actually in orbit around the fifth --the arc represents the rotation of this "moon". This moon is also inhabited --else it would be down on the lower level of the line. So, in summary:
"We inhabit three of the planets in our solar system and one moon."
At the bottom of our 1974 Arecibo message is a diagram of a radio telescope focusing rays to a point, with the numbers at the very bottom indicating the parabolic diameter.
The ET transmitter is an entirely different device. It would have to be anyway -by definition.
Because no inteligent life could have picked up our transmission so quickly --unless they have access to hyperspace capability. Because it takes literally thousands of light years for those radio waves to get any significant distance from Earth. For a moment, our 20-trillion-watt-equivalent blast of radio waves made us the brightest radio source in this galaxy. Somebody was alerted within 27 years rather than 27,000 years. That takes sense-at-a-distance hyperspace technology -either an industrial or a mind technology.
It's too early to be definitive about their transmitter. The layout looks like a beam generator -with the beam emerging out of the "lens" in the cenrer of the square box. Possibly powered by a scalar device or even piggybacking on pulsar energy.
But it's not too early to speculate on how this ET reply arrives on Earth as a crop circle image. The giveaway is that these astonishing crop images are in a field right next to a Radio Telescope - OF ALL THINGS!
Now how do we explain that?
Are we to believe that these ET's are able to direct some beam with sufficient accuracy as to land the image within a couple of hundred feet of a target on Earth. No way. If it was that accurate, then they could sign their name in the desert.
No, the explanation is that they sent the message back the way it had come. Not to precisely the same Puerto Rico radio telescope that transmitted in 1974, but to ANOTHER radio telescope. That has the hallmarks of a telepathic communication. Their message was telepathically transmitted with the mental instruction to return it to "source". The Earth did it's best to meet those paramaters when it used a field beside a radio telescope on which to draw the image.
TELEPATHIC TRANSMISSION
GALACTIC
TELEPATHY
close up of the transmitter section of the Chilbolton schematic
Thumbnail view of the Chilbolton face -note the cross-hatched "grid" in front of the face
Thumbnail view of the entire Chilbolton schematic. Now you can see that the transmitter section at the bottom has the SAME cross-hatching as the face above.
In other words -
the transmitter of the message is the same as the face behind the grid.
It's a telepathic communication.
Close-upgraphics are at:
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_reply.htm
The proof that the crop images were created by telepathic transmission is literally staring us in the "face".
Only when we viewed in thumbnail format the transmitter section of the Chilbolton schematic did the confused pattern of dots resolve into a cross hatch of lines - exactly similar to the cross-hatching pattern in front of the "face" in the other image.
The inference is obvious. The two crop images are meant to be viewed as a set. The face we see is the transmitter behind the message. Its a telepathic communication.
However, The representation of the "head" in the transmitter - does not have two dots for eyes and, say, three for a mouth. That would have been easy to do. Instead, the "head" has a tiny circle inside --like a lens of some sort. Indeed the device it looks like a TV camera.
How do we square both these clues with each other? Probably the communication is initiated by a telepathic mind --then boosted perhaps with a material technology that may manipulate fourth dimension scalar waves to amplify and enable telepathy-based galactic communications.
They are not transmitting a spacetime message like we did. That would be too slow. They are telepathically interracting with the Earth's collective consciousness; with its psychosphere; its biosphere. Once plugged into that, they can scrawl a message on our telephone notepad -so to speak:
"We did not use a radio telescope to send you this message but a telepathic beam technology. We used a hyperspace capability to intercept your spacetime message and are using hyperspace also to reply."
There is nothing too "wierd" about this scientific concept. If you can manipulate the scalar forces, then it is possible to transmit and sense in hyperspace -because at higher dimensions, the whole universe exists in a tiny point. That's how they were able to wave their Quantum mental tendrils around and detect our message long before it would ever physically arrive.
However this discussion of the capacity to manipulate the Earth's biosphere is a double edged sword for our presumed ET origin of this transmission. It could just be our own collective unconscious generating the images all by itself. Like an image in a dream, the Chilbolton message could be us talking to ourselves at night in Jungian psych-dreams of ET archetypes.
So, as we ponder the significance of all this, we wonder at the origin of the face that acompanies the Chilbolton schematic. Who is that --looking out thru a fine mesh at us?
Is it THEM?
Or is it US?
.....MORE FOLLOWS .....on
http://www.psyopnews.com
URL
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_reply.htm
.....and Exclusively on
http://www.rumormillnews.com
.....SOON
.....PsyOp wargame or Real contact?
.....scalar psychic forces
Copyright reserved 2001 www.psyopnews.com by
Fintan Dunne, Kathy McMhaon and PsyOpNews.com
Reproduce freely on non-commercial / alternative media
------------------------------
SOURCES & LINKS
------------------------------
CropCircleConnector.com Chilbolton page
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/August2001a.html
Chilbolton crop circle in the SAME field in 2000
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/chilbolton2/chilbolton2000a1_small.jpg
DETAIL GRAHICS OF ARICHEBO SCHEMATIC
http://www.astronomica.org/Gallery/seti/images/seti11.jpg
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2001/chilbolton2/arecibo_big.jpg
HOW THE ARECIBO MESSAGE WAS CODED
http://www.astronomica.org/Gallery/seti/seti11.html
http://www.angelfire.com/on2/daviddarling/AreciboM.htm
ARICHEBO BACKGROUND
http://www.seti-inst.edu/science/a-message.html
SETI HOMEPAGE
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
SETI CHRONOLOGY
http://www.setileague.org/general/history.htm
