tena's note: This is what VDK is talking about, the RRF and the NRF! NWO owns NATO--France and Germany are playacting to distance themselves from the Israeli-USA war..when in reality they do want the war and the total control it gives..Solana is ALWAYS right there where bad things are suddenly popping up..the leaders of the EU have always had the "black nobility" behind them, we have just not been able to see it because they kept it hidden well. SURPRISE! China may think that the EU rivals Amerika's power right now! It's all about the money, and the NWO/Moabites will soon be in your neighborhood kiddies..read this whole thing to learn.
Quote:
THE USA IS AT THE END OF THE FOOD CHAIN. IF YOU WANT TO SAVE AMERICA YOU FIRST BETTER UNDERSTAND THAT THE EU LEADERSHIP THAT WANTS TO ENMESH ITSELF IN THE MIDDLE EAST, THE ONE THAT WANTS JERUSALEM, IS YOUR ENEMY AND IS BEHIND THE NWO/MOABITE AGENTS IN OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE USA WHO HAVE PUSHED IT DOWN THE DRAIN THESE MANY YEARS SINCE 9-11.
Unquote!
Subject: Ehrlich: Followup to URGENT WARNING....(serious historical material)
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:35:59 EDT
From: Senderberl@aol.com
Here is a great article. It brings into play the NRF, the NATO Response Force, and the RRF the EU Rapid Reaction Force. Both are Moabite creations readied for insertion into the Middle East. China has long known that its true enemy is the EU. Thus, the Moabites are now inserting themselves via NATO and anyone who does not stop them NOW is NWO aligned.
The German-EU Grows Restless Over Mideast Crisis
by David Ben-Ariel Sunday July 30, 2006 at 04:08 AM
Europe's rapid response to jihad will be a NEW CRUSADE
The EU is itchin' for a fight, frustrated, getting too big for its britches, and feels the growing need for some piece of the global action and fast.
Michael Shtender-Auerbach offers a convincing argument in the EUOBSERVER that NATO is dead, the UN is ineffective, and categorically states Europe must rise to the occasion and exert world leadership in the Middle East and fill the power vacuum that is becoming clearer with each crisis that merely evokes a slow and tedious response after much haggling:
The European Union should consider the immediate dispatch of its EU Rapid Reaction Force (RRF) - invoking the EU Rapid Reaction Mechanism (RRM) - to southern Lebanon. The RRF is a European military force that can be "triggered in situations of crisis and armed conflict," and falls under the auspices of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Its development was predicated on the idea that the EU needs a force that can act independently of US-led NATOmissions. The RRF's mandate limits its deployment to six months, which would afford enough time for Europe to build a semi-permanent EU force like the one deployed in the Balkans, or ideally, the development and deployment of the Lebanese army to secure its own peace.
Herr Shtender-Auerbach is right on, according to the prophecies within your Bible - biblical prophecies that Herbert W. Armstrong faithfully warned about for years. Mr. Armstrong was truly a lone voice in the wilderness (while others, misguided, focused on Russia).
Such a blitzkrieg force, EU Rapid Reaction Force (RRF), was destined to emerge and transform from peacekeepers to war mongerers in a nuclear flash! Such peacekeepers are wolves in sheep's clothing. They also serve to distract from continental woes and unite Europe in a common cause, rallying the Europeans with the hope of keeping the Muslim hordes at bay and warning those within to stay still or be silenced (by a growing backlash against Muslim subversion of "Christian Western civilization" coupled with brazen demands for conformity to their Koranic code).
Germany assumes power over the European Union in 2007. Will Iran unleash terror on Vienna? Berlin? Rome? Won't the Bavarian pope stress how providential for Germany to exercise authority at such a crucial time? Will Germany remove its mask, reveal the beast and bare its fangs as it seizes control of the situation and commands Europe to follow their lead? Hasn't Germany been showing increasing signs of such restlessness and become hungry like a wolf for purpose?
Europe's rapid response to jihad will be a NEW CRUSADE, a clash of civilizations that butt heads in the Middle East and crowns Europe the victor and Islam the vanquished, forcibly brought into submission, yet EU mission accomplished with an evil eye on Jerusalem, specifically the Temple Mount.
The United States is bankrupt, our army overextended, and troubles are brewing at home that will demand the attention of our troops, as our own borders are compromised and our national security undermined by treacherous inaction by our president and politicians. We're simply going to have to withdraw American troops from around the world, starting with American forces in Germany.
David Ben-Ariel is a Christian-Zionist writer and author of Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall. With a focus on the Middle East and Jerusalem, his analytical articles help others improve their understanding of that troubled region.
Source: http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/118056.php
SenderBerl wrote as follows on June 11 2003 on Rense.com
Furthermore, particularly egregious is the legerdemain we identified when France and Germany acted the part of opposing the attack on Iraq. The truth of it is that they both were players with the shadow US government in the pursuit of the NWO agenda, and they are both prime beneficiaries of the invasion and seizure of Middle East oil. Moreover, the NWO took full advantage of this charade to create a new European alliance to substitute for NATO, thereby laying the
foundation of removing the USA from the new alliance, a NWO desired consequence, when the USA becomes a weakened and maimed nation economically, psychologically and morally; the end result from institutionalization of drugs, sabotaging public education, deleterious television programming, the subterfuge of NAFTA, allowing open immigration and the acceptance of a second language to predate and platform the evisceration of US borders, the NWO's form of the right of return. Staging US troops for WMD attack, US cities for dirty nuclear bombs, terrorism; the country for economic malaise, emasculating the US dollar (by NWO design not anyone else's), are all part and parcel of the dislocation of remaining infrastructure, to leave a maimed and weakened America for the time when the likes of an Al Sharpton, because of the racial shift in the USA, can assume high office in this land. When that happens, there is no way they are going to have a strong America and American military fall into the hands and control of such rift raft, the regretted result foretold when the ancestry of the NWO leadership lost their destined role in the development of this nation with its great resources because of a group of terrorists that history books identify as American revolutionaries.
The elitist centrix sees them through the centuries as terrorists, and thus they feel totally justified in their taking back (recapturing) what they verily believe is justly theirs and have not the slightest regret in preparing the American people for the forthcoming planned destruction of the White House and US Capitol buildings. Then they can sit again in their carriages in Europe, running the world, and mow down children with impunity, and without conscience or remorse bill the parents for the unforgivable damage their deceased and maimed children caused to their carriages for the egregious error of stepping in front of their horses and impeding their travel.
===
The EU Must Act
Michael Shtender-Auerbach, The Century Foundation, 7/27/2006
The international conference in Rome on July 26 offered hope that a consensus could be reached on a plan that would end the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. But the conference ended without a resolution, and the members of the European Union are scrambling to salvage their first diplomatic attempt to end the current crisis. The European Union should not be discouraged; it is capable of conducting a pro-active foreign policy and has the ability to commit the necessary financial, diplomatic, and military resources to bring stability and peace to the region. The European Union must act decisively as a counterbalance to U.S. unilateralism by proposing a European solution to the current crisis.
The failure of the talks have been blamed on U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who was "under siege" from the European and Arab state participants who were calling for an immediate cease-fire. Dr. Rice remained steadfast in her demand that any cease-fire must be preceded by the disarmament of Hezbollah. In true diplomatic fashion, humanitarian and reconstruction aid were agreed upon, but the hypocrisy of Washington doling out reconstruction aid to Lebanon with one hand and missiles to Israel with the other did not go unnoticed.
However, the chief problem is that the European Union, which has an unprecedented opportunity to bring regional stability and an end to the deadly conflict between Israel and its neighbors, is holding back, as if it needs a permission slip from the United States before it can act.
Unlike the United States, whose inaction in the face of the widening catastrophe has squandered its bona fides as a negotiator for peace, the European Union is still a credible broker in the region; Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and the Palestinian Authority are members of the European
Neighborhood Policy (ENP)--their relationship yields more than 45 billion dollars in trade annually. The European Union also has normalized diplomatic and trade relations with Iran, the implicit puppet-master of this proxy war.
The European Union should consider the immediate dispatch of its EU Rapid Reaction Force (RRF)--invoking the EU Rapid Reaction Mechanism (RRM)--to southern Lebanon. The RRF is a European military force that can be "triggered in situations of crisis and armed conflict," and falls under the auspices of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy. Its development was predicated on the idea that the European Union needs a force that can act independently of U.S.-led NATO missions. The RRF's mandate limits its deployment to six months, which would afford enough time for Europe to build a semi-permanent EU force like the one deployed in the Balkans, or ideally, the development and deployment of the Lebanese army to secure its own peace.
Moving in this direction is necessary for a number of reasons. For one thing, Dr. Rice's desire to see a U.S.-led NATO force deployed to southern Lebanon with the charge of ridding the area of Hezbollah operatives entirely, involves NATO deployment for ninety days, after which a UN sponsored force would take charge. However, France's president Jacques Chirac, who would support an EU force, opposes the idea of a NATO-led force, stating, "As far as France is concerned, it is not NATO's mission to put together such a force--Whether we like it or not, NATO is perceived as the armed wing of the west in these regions, and as a result, in terms of image, NATO is not intended for this." Thus, if Washington continues to push for a NATO force, the Atlantic alliance is at risk of collapse. Moreover, the United Nations is not up to the task: UNIFL, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon , has failed to keep the peace, loses its mandate at the end of this month, and has already suffered casualties in this war.
Another solution that would not work is that proposed by Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief and former secretary general of NATO, who has proposed an international force made up of troops from Europe, Turkey, and the Arab states (which would be almost all Sunni). Dr. Solana's vision is short-sighted and likely has more to do with a desire to pawn the manpower needed onto Turkey and Egypt, even though Egypt has categorically stated that it will not be a part of such a force.
The other problem with Dr. Solana's vision is that by putting Sunni boots on Shia ground, the possibility of more bloodshed and wider scale conflict increases dramatically. In Iraq, radical Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has voiced his support for Hezbollah (which is a Lebanese Islamic Shi'ite group), and announced he is recruiting an army to deploy to southern Lebanon. The Iranian press reports that a deployment of Shi'ite suicide bombers has been dispatched to Lebanon with a mandate of inciting a civil war. While there may be Sunni support for Hezbollah, including Al Qaeda (a Sunni fundamentalist terror network) in its campaign against Israel, this support will be short-lived once a cease-fire has been attained. Osama bin-Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri has stated as much: "War with Israel does not depend on ceasefires. It is Jihad for sake of God and will last until religion prevails from Spain to Iraq." The religion al-Zawahri speaks of does not include his Shi'ite cousins.
The case for an EU force must also take into account Europe's refusal to list Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, which opens the door for direct negotiations with hopes for the possibility that an EU force can maintain the peace without firing a shot.
Israel also has indicated willingness for a highly trained European force to be deployed as a stabilization entity in Lebanon. In fact, this is the second time in a year that Israel has requested EU military assistance. Back in November 2005, Israel asked EU monitors to guard the Gaza/Egyptian border. While the EU monitors had no mandate to use force, Israel requested it. Israel realizes that it needs international support now more than ever, and the Europeans would be remiss to squander this opportunity.
On Tuesday, August 1, the EU foreign ministers will hold an emergency meeting to discuss how best to organize a UN-mandated international force; a force that, the European Union must be reminded, is readily at their disposal. There is no time to waste. As Terje Roed Larsen, the United Nation's chief envoy for Syrian/Lebanon issues, just said, "I do not feel confident that this war between Israel and Hezbollah has peaked yet." The European Union must act before it is too late.
Michael Shtender-Auerbach writes on foreign policy for The Century Foundation and is press director of the Security and Peace Initiative. a version of this article originally appeared in the EU Observer on July 28, 2007.
===
The creation of the EU's 60,000-strong Rapid Reaction Force (RRF) coincided with the establishment of NATO's 21,000-strong Response Force (NRF). This begs the question as to whether the EU is enhancing the security of Europe through new military capabilities or merely "re-hatting" existing forces.
===
EU viewed by China as world power to rival US
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
The European Union is the world's rising superpower, poised to overtake both America and Japan as the biggest trade and investment force in China, according to a strategic policy paper published by Beijing yesterday.
The Chinese government said the EU was transforming the global landscape with its successful currency launch and strides towards a joint foreign policy, defence, and judicial union.
Describing EU integration as "irreversible," Beijing marvelled at Europe's 25-35 per cent share of the global economy and its projected 450 million population after expanding into the former communist bloc next year.
The white paper follows a flurry of Sino-EU ventures, including the Galileo global satellite system, described as a direct challenge to the American GPS monopoly in space.
The two sides are also working together on nuclear research.
France and Germany have been pushing hardest for closer ties with China, hoping to cash in on a lucrative market but also to develop a strategic alliance as a counterweight to American power after the diplomatic trauma of the Iraq war.
Last June, the French defence minister, Michele Alliot-Marie, proposed sharing sensitive military technology with Beijing. She called for a softening of the arms embargo imposed on the country after the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989.
The Chinese already have the world's second biggest defence budget, £40 million annually, but they have to rely on outdated weaponry bought from Russia and Ukraine.
Yesterday's white paper said the ever-closer military ties rendered the EU embargo a relic from the last century.
China's efforts to court Brussels reflect a new mood of respect for the EU across Asia. India is also rushing to upgrade its ties with Europe, recruiting extra staff to lobby EU officials and MEPs.
Source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/10/14/weu14.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/10/14/ixworld.html
Ehrlich:
Conclusion: Allowing the EU into the Middle East begets the path to the end days. Stopping the EU and seeing Israel and Iran unite as I have been literally begging all this year will stop the biblical path and open a portal for Israel and Iran with China to fumigate the NWO/Moabites.
Ehrlich: Note how the Germans are arising militarily again. If they are building Israel nuclear subs it takes little to deduce that they have such assets for themselves. Moreover, they are taking an active role in the NRF and RRF and in 2007 they will assume leadership of the EU.
Enough is enough. If Israel doesn't unite with Iran and I see Peres pushes Israel still with the EU/NWO/Moabites then I will 100% prepare myself for global warfare and what so many refer to as the end days.
THE USA IS AT THE END OF THE FOOD CHAIN. IF YOU WANT TO SAVE AMERICA YOU FIRST BETTER UNDERSTAND THAT THE EU LEADERSHIP THAT WANTS TO ENMESH ITSELF IN THE MIDDLE EAST, THE ONE THAT WANTS JERUSALEM, IS YOUR ENEMY AND IS BEHIND THE NWO/MOABITE AGENTS IN OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE USA WHO HAVE PUSHED IT DOWN THE DRAIN THESE MANY YEARS SINCE 9-11.
===
E-mail received:
Inasmuch as China is unlikely to stand up at the UN and veto a "peacekeeping" UN force, and Israel cannot afford another PR debacle by refusing a cease fire and a UN peace keeping force, the only way to halt the intrusion of the NWO countries into Israel and its environs is for the warring nations to forge a peace agreement by themselves and announce it to the world and the subsequent lack of need for any foreign troops to keep a truce forced upon them. Perhaps China, or better yet, IRAN could broker such an agreement!
Ehrlich: That is what I would call seizing opportunity from crisis.
===
The Chinese soldier acting under the UN was killed by Israeli forces and was hailed by China as a martyr, yet China wisely stayed out of the middle east war directly. In building upon your analysis in your current email, the NWO/Moabites have viewed bUSh's (purposefully spelled this way) efforts in the middle east as ineffective, so they - as you have pointed out - have decided to enter the region directly. The EU/NATO troops will likewise be "martyred" at some future point, but the EU/NATO will not back down nor away from the conflagration, but enter into it directly and with full force of more troops and with "full justification," for after all, they were just trying to "keep the peace" and look what happened to their peacekeepers ...The NWO/EU/NATO will thereby have their justification to put a final end to the "middle east problem" - a scenario that could still bring about the NWO/Moabite's deeply desired WWIII!
Ehrlich: Correct. Israel did not trigger regional/global war so the EU who now knows that China and allies know is their primary target, will take it from here. Thus, the need to STOP them now because once in they will drive the show to WWIII.
END
