Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
are there any terrorists who aren't Israeli?..I try to approach this subject with reason and objectivity..does Israel target civilians? quite possibly..does hezbolla target civilians? just about two hundred rockets a day, right into the heart of Israels cities..who are the real terrorists? and what happened to objectivity?
here is another angle...printed with permission..
DEAD BABIES IN QANA – THE CIA CONNECTION
~~~~~ What the News Media Never Told You and Why ~~~~~
Last Sunday July 30, 2006 , according to news reports, Israeli jets
struck and killed 56 innocent people, mostly children. That's according
to mainstream news media reports in the last four days, so be careful.
The actual facts are far different, and there is something wrong with
the news media reports.
It became apparent by Monday, that the Israeli attack on the Hezbollah
Katyusha rocket launcher truck was about 400 yards away from the
collapsed building where all the bodies were. That's the distance of four
football fields. The Israeli air attack took place about 12:00 midnight.
The Israeli pilot camera videos show the truck was destroyed and that
no missiles hit the 3-story building, supposedly filled with people.
Other overhead photos show the top of the building still intact long
after midnight.
But news reports, seemingly directed by Hezbollah, report that at 7:30
am, an hour after dawn, when it was light outside, the building
collapsed according to numerous news service videos showing the collapsed
building. The collapse of the building, was said by witnesses on the scene
and reported on the news videos as due to missiles from the Israeli
jets. But the Israeli attack was over seven hours before, and no planes
were in the area after that. Is something beginning to look strange
here?
Then late Sunday, an observer in Britain, copied the live video of
bodies being carried from the collapsed building and he took still-frame
shots out of the videos. The videos had the live time-stamp showing when
the video was taken. The British observer posted to his website the
photos of a young girl being put into an ambulance at 7:30 am. Two and a
half hours later at 10:00am a picture of that same girl is shown being
put into another ambulance. And then 45 minutes later that same girl
is shown being carried out of the rubble by a man with no ambulances
around. Is someone trying to pull a fast one here?
The news reports still continue today that Israeli jets killed 56 in
Qana, but the actual body count by observers on the ground only find 27
bodies, not 56. Could this difference in numbers be due to the same
bodies being carried out, in front of the video news cameras, two or three
times? It's been done before. Example of something similar; several
years ago news reports showed the results of Israeli bombings in Gaza.
The Arab news services showed in live real time, the funeral crowd
carrying a dead body on a litter. The crowd got rambunctious and the body
fell off the litter. So the “dead body” got up and jumped back on the
litter. I saw it with my own eyes, live. But for the American news
media, that part with the “dead body” getting back on the litter was
clipped out. Are the Arabic TV services just good at propaganda, or are
the American and western news services just slow on the uptake and can't
figure out that they have been conned? Let's continue.
On Tuesday a number of observers around the world watched the taped
videos and noticed something “wrong” with the dead bodies. They were too
dead. Meaning they were stiff as a board. Rigor mortis had set in.
Meaning the bodies had been dead long before the Israeli jet attack at
midnight, and certainly long before the collapse of the building in Qana
at 7:30 am. So those people didn't die from Israeli jets nor from
collapsing buildings. Where did they come from? Some researchers figure
they may have come out the back door of the nearby hospital at Tyre and
were then trucked to the building in Qana. So obviously this was a
massive staged media event. But why?
Remember last week, I reported on the Hezbollah game with the Zelzal
missiles parked in the fenced-in area in Syria, and then the launch
trucks drive through the gate into Lebanon, launch their missiles then drive
back across the fence to Syria. This was supposed to force Israeli
pilots to chase the launch trucks back into Syria and then Syria would be
drawn into the war, because Syrian territory was being attacked by
Israeli pilots. This was the same provocation technique done last week,
when Hezbollah soldiers parked their rocket launch trucks under the UN
observer outpost, forcing the Israeli pilots to attack the outpost,
killing four UN observers, but the blame was placed on Israel not Hezbollah.
The news media got it backwards, and still does. Why?
OK, so if I got the story about the Hezbollah Zelzal game to bring
Syria into the war, then you can assume that Israeli intelligence also had
that same story. Meaning that the Israeli/Lebanese border right next
to Syria was under continuous observation from Israeli pilots, so that
the Zelzals could be destroyed right at launch on the Lebanese side of
the border before they can scoot back to Syria, and then Syria has no
excuse for entering the war.
The only way Hezbollah could play the Zelzal missile trick from Syria
is to halt the Israeli planes from flying overhead. But how to do that?
That was the Sunday media event in Qana. All the front pages around
the world and all TV news outlets carried the horrible visual story of
Israel killing 56 innocent children in Qana. As a result, Israel
announced a 48 hour bombing halt, to allow all civilians to escape from the
war zone in southern Lebanon. But if you notice, that Israeli bombing
halt only lasted about 48 seconds not hours, especially along the border
with Syria. The result was no Zelzals came through the fence to play
the terror game to get Syria into the war. Instead of missiles, on
Monday and Tuesday, Hezbollah launched their largest Iranian rockets, the
FR-5 modified to go about 140 miles. That's not far enough to make it
to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem, but it was farther than Haifa.
So the event with the “stiff” bodies in Qana, was a staged event, but
not just for propaganda value, but simply a war strategy to get Israel
to call a bombing halt, so Hezbollah could play the Zelzal game. But
the strategy didn't work since Israel did not halt the bombing along the
Syrian border, only in the rest of the war zone. Hezbollah had failed
in their military ploy to play the Zelzal trick, by using the “dead”
bodies in Qana.
All of this is a very interesting reporting of events as seen through
the fog of war. What gets first reported in the media is not always
what actually happened. But the much bigger story is why does the
American mainstream news media, almost a week after the event still report
that Israeli jets killed 56 innocent children in Qana? On Tuesday, when
confronted with the facts listed above, some of the American news
executives still insist that it was all Israel's fault. Why? And the
executives claim that researchers on the Internet have no right to question
the news authority of the likes of ABC, AP, New York Times and UPI. OH
really?
Maybe your assumption is wrong that the American news media, on your TV
or newspaper, is independent and objective. The BroJon Gazette has
been for years telling you that the news media is carefully and closely
controlled by a single outside source. At the top of this page is the
quote which tells the source. “We'll know our disinformation program is
complete when everything the American public believes is false.” And
that comes directly from the mouth of the CIA director, Bill Casey, in
1981. That CIA policy did not come from Bill Casey in '81, it started
much earlier, right after the founding of the CIA in 1947.
You may think that is outrageous and impossible. You think I am making
it up. Not so. You want documented proof. How about an internal CIA
document mistakenly declassified and released under the FOIA act, then
quickly reclassified and locked up again, after it was discovered what
the document said.
That, 20 December 1991, document seems to be just an internal memo of
meetings held at the request of the CIA director to create more openness
about CIA activities. The director called for suggestions how that
could be done. That was probably why the document was temporarily
released since the name and cover pages seem to be only results of discussion
meetings. But instead on page 7, there is a paragraph explaining how
the CIA has had “agents” within each and every, in fact all, of the
American news media and how they control the stories which are published.
Here is that paragraph:
-------------------------
“PAO (Public Affairs Office) now has relationships with
reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly and
television network in the nation. This has helped us turn some "intelligence
failure" stories into "intelligence success" stories, and it has
contributed to the accuracy of countless others. In many instances, we have
persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories
that could have adversely affected national security interests or
jeopardized sources and methods.”
-------------------------
If you want to read the complete document and find out what that
paragraph means in the full context of the document you can view the complete
document here:
Note that the document is scanned into a PDF document and you need a
PDF reader to view the document. It is not available as an HTML text.
The original blacked out sections and some notes and signatures are
still visible in the scanned PDF document, so it is in original condition
with the CIA numbers and all.
So it is now proved, by CIA's own documents, that the American news
media has been an agent of the CIA for decades. What you have been
reading in your newspaper, or see on TV, is simply the CIA view of the world.
So what gets changed? Just reports of wars, or assassinations or
disease threats or just national security stories? According to CIA
Director Casey's statement, what gets changed is “everything.” The purpose
of the disinformation program is to put the American population in a
constant condition of confusion and distrust. The Americans become
mindless sheep who will “come willingly into our molding hands.” That quote
about “molding hands” comes directly from John D. Rockefeller, in his
preface to his 1905 document, founding his General Education Board. The
GEB later became the US Department of Education, to spend billions of
federal dollars to make sure no American can read or think for
themselves, but simply “come willingly...”
So it is shown that you live in a world where all that you know is
controlled by the CIA. But who controls the CIA? As I pointed out in
“Black Gold Hot Gold,” the CIA is a subset of “The Empire of Energy.”
That's why most of the wars in the last 100 years have been about oil. But
who was it that wrote the “world script” which runs all the events, and
what is the “script.” You can see an outline of that “script.” It is
the book Black Gold Hot Gold, itself, found on the BroJon Gazette front
page. I have recently come into a copy of the original script itself.
It is over 100 years old. But that script was not adopted by the
Empire of Energy until 1913. You want to know where to find that script?
That's coming next....
Serving Freedom
and Liberty
