Thank you for joining in here ;-)
You said it: "This is almost an "everybody against everybody" right now. And those who have the wealth and status to play an active role in this theater, mostly play for their own applause - while the majority of the people on this earth will fight for their own survival and that of their family. Allthough, these are the ones who are really desperate - and this activates by far more energies than those, possessing the "powers to be", will ever be capable to even imagine.
That's OUR chance, folks! "
.
In a couple of posts further below of today - linked for ease of reference here with internally embedded hyper-links:
EIGHT EIGHT EIGHT - MAGNETIC POLARIZATION
* http://astro11ogy.blogspot.com/2006/08/eight-eight-eight.html
I was looking at the astrological alignments & the overall "psychological-spiritual climate" for the coming months, and we were enquiring about the meaning of "Glorified Tribalism" - or we could actually also call it "Global Tribalization".
LaRouche has often proven to have very much up-to-the-minute and usually accurate information, yet he himself suffers also of a violent mind that is rarely at peace or in "the way of the sufi" style detached from his views -- and so we never know what agenda or "factionalized" thought process he is involved in. But there is actually nothing wrong in what he showed us here through your blue essay post.
Anyway; so as to finish the thought process we had begun when I juxta-posed purposefully the U.N. "resolution draft" for Lebanon and the "talk" (speech) by Krishnamurti given over twenty years ago at U.N. in New York, we see what he answered to some of the "dignitaries" and participants after that talk which everyone should really read and memorize to comprehend it:
It is the answer for all our friends with enquiring minds, for all the U.N. and all the dilpomats of the world of today and of tomorrow, L. LaRouche included -- here a short excerpt from this link:
* http://chamber11.blogspot.com/2006/08/un-glorified-tribalism.html
.
QUESTION: At the end you said that we need to break the pattern of conflict between man. My question to you is, do you see that as something of an evolutionary process that inevitably will happen? Or do you see it as something that we all have to work very hard to achieve? And there is an expression that goes something like this: in times of darkness the eye begins to see. And why I am throwing this at you because in a sense it is either going to happen, or it is not going to happen, but how do you see it happening?
K: I don't quite understand your question, sir.
Q: All right. You talk about breaking the pattern, man has a pattern, the brain has a pattern, and that pattern has to be broken in order for there to be peace in the world.
K: Of course.
Q: Now do you see the breaking of that pattern being an active movement, or a natural progression in the evolution of man?
K: Sir, have we evolved at all?
Q: I think we are continuously evolving.
K: So you accept evolution - psychological evolution, we are not talking about biological or technical evolution - psychological evolution. After a million years, of fifty thousand years, have we changed deeply? Aren't we very primitive, barbarous? So I am asking if you will consider whether there is psychological evolution at all? I question it.
Personally, to the speaker, there is no psychological evolution: there is only the ending of sorrow, of pain, anxiety, loneliness, despair and all that. Man has lived with it for a million years. And if we rely on time, which is thought - time and thought go together - if we rely on evolution then another thousand years or more, and we will still be barbarous.
Q: My question is: what would have to happen for there to begin to be psychological evolution as the speaker understands it?
K: What about psychological evolution? I don't quite understand the question.
Q: You have said that you do not think there has been psychological evolution. My question is: what can happen so that there will be, so that there can be, psychological evolution.
K: Madam, I am afraid we haven't understood each other. We have lived on this earth from the historical, as well as ancient enquiry, on this earth for fifty thousand years or more or less. And during that long period of evolution psychologically, inwardly, subjectively, we have remained more or less barbarous - hating each other, killing each other. And time is not going to solve that problem, which is evolution. And is it possible, we are asking, for each human being, who is the rest of the world, whether that psychological movement can stop and see something afresh?
Q: I wanted to ask you the same question phrased in a different way: what should we do in order to effect this resistance towards evolution. I just want to say one more thing. There was a Dr Bohm last month, he said the same thing you are saying in a different way, he is a scientist, he was explaining the same problem. I wonder what do you think we could we do right now in order to effect this?
K: I have got it. What could you do right now? Right? Change completely! - both psychologically and outwardly. First the psychological revolution, not evolution, but revolution, change completely. That is the real action of humankind, not trying to fiddle around on the periphery.
.
Our friends here can also take a look at: