Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Difficult transformation.
I am a great fan of Dr. Greer. His personal account brings more to fore the vastness of the transformation required. Most of the account is in the vein of 'You probably won't belief this, but...."
But in reality this is more to the point. We are being required to make a big leap..., a leap of mind.
The Age of Reason while elevating the scientific method devalued mysticism. Suddenly the world was 'energy and matter', a pantheism of 'two'. To believe in other than physical reality and energy, that there were other realities, was regulated as an aside..., to religion. And to not be 'covered' by a religion and hold a belief in other realities was associated with lunacy or met with knowing skepticism. In fact the mass mind was split in two..., you can believe beyond energy and matter only under certain conditions which are also suspect, (religion and such).
Given the slow progress in mathematics we tend to think of it as set in concrete. We don't see it as a process of understanding. We have even forgotten that the ten based math system (the Roman's were using a six base) is relatively new (about 1000 years) and that the present system of ten is based on the kaballah map.
If you believe in angels it is okay if you are Catholic. In fairies, well you had better be a poet, and still taken as somewhat of a fruitcake.
However, those who have studied UFOs, the psychic, abductions etc. soon found themselves facing a big problem. I am thinking of Vallee, Dr. Mack and Dr. Greer. Suddenly they were faced not with just UFO's and abductions but elves, fairies, spirits of the dead, and all kinds of other things beyond the fringe.
Yes, this material is being suppressed by secret government. But that suppression is mostly a reinforcement of an IDEA of scientific method and thinking. It is as if we are asked almost to take a step back into the dark ages saying, "Oh my God, it is all real !" Yes and no. That is not really a step backwards..., it will go along with future science. See:
www.red-ice.net/specialreports/2006/01jan/supernaturaluniverse.html
I was brought up a full believer in normal science. Today I don't have a problem with interacting with a big four foot brownie which helps me with the garden. But I did not make this jump with ease..., it was a long slow altering of belief. Those who rail away at 'secret government' should start to see that the most powerful thing they can really do is to loosen the set of belief structures in their minds that have been imposed through modern education. Schopenhauer, Decartes, Sigmund Fraud, Darwin, even those who never heard these names are effected by teachers who have. Not easy. Not easy at all.
Dr. Mack (famous now deceased Harvard psychiatrist who studied alien abduction) wrote quite a bit in the same vein as Dr. Greer is now writing. I will paraphrase Dr. Mack's general conclusion to the modern dilemma as this: (my words).
We need to continue studying this phenomena. When we do, and we try to make it official, accepted by the academic community, we suddenly hit a wall. Some of this wall is deliberate government interference. But not all of it. Most of it is broad general belief in a limiting science. With the UFO/abduction phenomena comes along the psychic and all forms of strangeness, now taken seriously, that at present is related to nuttiness, visions, elves, the dead, star visitors...., all at once. If we try to limit the study more to 'nuts and bolts' acceptable (or more acceptable) to present 'normal' scientific thinking...., we throw out most of our better material and insights.
Want to start fighting 'secret government'. Open your minds. Throw out ALL old beliefs. You will find you never needed them. They were hampering you.
Wish to take a more powerful step? Share your alteration of belief with others even when you expect the raised eyebrow. Ignore it and go on about your business. It may be the sixth or seventh time a person hears from another that the official 9/11 story is bogus that he starts to search the Internet on the issue.
You never know. For example: Yesterday I am mailing off samples of plants inside and outside the local crop circle to a biologist in the Midwest. There are only two in the post office so I start to open up and talk about it. The other customer tells me about a circle formed on ice this winter on a friend's pond. You never know. Invite disbelief. Usually it takes time.
I invite comment.
Donovan
