...will come back into monetary power under a new front, a new mooney, a "new FED"?? - asks a reader, regarding VKD's rumor of the FED DOWN?
Btw. that's exactly what I was hearing since more than two years from bankers. And I've been telling it you all the time to take precautions instead of cheering and walking "useless" miles into a dead end street by design...
Re: Reader: WHAT WOULD THIS MEAN TO THE AVERAG....
well ,I've been waiting TOO...:)
HAVE A Q? FOR V.K.DURHAM...
OK...
What and how would things change if TPTB come back to you and 'WE' again base
money on the GOLD standard?
What would 'WE' see as it is changed?
What would the transition be for us that don't have anything left except these
FED credit slips(Notes)?
What about those that have criminally take everything that people THINK they
own?
Wouldn't these same crooks continue to be wealthy and just change paper?
Still being in control?
Wouldn't that just be the same?
I'am asking because I would like to know what I and everyone else needs to
expect from a change.
ST
Just what I said. VKD has provided excellent background info and tons of documentations that showed us what scam lies behind this all. BUT WHERE IS A SOLUTION? What to do for "average Mr.&Mrs. Smith"?? How to proceed on a practical level???
VKD writes:
"...Lets get our Real Laws back and get rid of the MOB RULE. If we don't...--we will most assuredly have WWIII because other nations are overly tired of the BULL SHIPPING the US has been putting out since the 1980's..."
Yes, fine - but HOW TO PROCEED and what will be the consequences it you storm Capitol Hill with pans and pots? WHAT COMES AFTER? WHERE IS A "PLAN" of HOW TO PROCEED AFTERWARDS?
Esclarmonde, you're likewise good at fueling with calls and trying to create a sensibility for that very theme. But where is your solution for what should come AFTER THE "REVOLUTION"?
We have at least tried to think into that direction, as in:
OUR RECIPE TO LEAD THE WORLD OUT OF THE NWO MORASS... *PIC*
FarSight3 -- Wednesday, 22 June 2005, 3:57 p.m.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=73473
...and have often enough warned by examples (see what happened AFTER the French "Revolution") that the crucical timefrime lies NOT in "how to fuel revolutions" - but in the AFTERMATH - and how "honorable" ideas are usurpated BY THE SAME PTBS THE "REVOLUTION" should be against - but wasn't, finally!
So what are YOUR consequences of your "We own this country"? aside that it is a catchy slogan? Did you think of "what comes after", did you think of a solution, are your tactics coordinated, do you have a plan you are willing to share with us, even a hypothetically one - we may discuss and evaluate?
VKD meanwhile, has sent additional material to look at:
The Federal Reserve Bank EXPOSE Video
http://snipurl.com/fedvideo
...provided by Gary North's REALITY CHECK (question@kbot.com), Issue ; December 27, 2005 - a 45-minute documentary on the Federal Reserve System. Thank you.
And for connecting to Esclarmonde's "...we don't need any Euros telling us what happens when the Fed dies an ignominious death!.." I may remind you that the issue of the central banking system comes from Europe. We Europeans are already "suffering" from similar problems for more than 100s of years that you have been recognizing only lately. You should be glad that other people are breaking their heads, offering additional "out-of-the-foix-ideas" and try to support your most likely honorable intentions apart from the usual "with us or against us". As the path to true success is NEVER black or white.
And I believe - we have summarized the problem more than once, with the dictum, "Money is a political artifact."
I speak here of Money, not Wealth.
The two are not synonymous. When the former is identified with the latter, civilisation will sooner or later undergo collapse, as true wealth is monopolized and parasitized.
How to be rid of privately owned central banks (corporations whose shares are owned or controlled by non-state entities)? Simple: by the stroke of a legislative pen. In theory, the US Congress can invoke the American Constitution, which provides that Congress has the sole power to issue money and manage the money supply.
There is a superstition regarding PAPER money, that it must be a "commodity money" backed by gold or silver, this to restrain over issue, which in theory works but in practice never does. Libertarians, who are anti-state, are, and would be, especially fond of this superstition. Their solution does not solve the inescapable problem of the political power resident in the control of the money supply.
Moreover security in private property is no wise dependent upon "free" private banking. Quite to the contrary, the former is historically speaking threatened by the latter. Those "private" banks NEVER have been "befriended" with those middle classes and "small" enterpreneurs that make up the majority and the wealth of a nation.
A PRIVATE CENTRAL BANK is as fine an instrument as any to the implementation of pure communism, suggesting that, just as their is not a dime's worth of difference between the American Republican and Democratic parties, except in the erstwhile differences of their fiscal policies, which define how they step and fetch for the Federal Reserve, there is no functional difference in the political teleologies of Capitalism and Communism, the point-counterpoint of the great toccata of the Federal Reserve System.
War on 'error, Part 3: "Resistance is sensible"!
Far Sight 3
Serving Freedom
and Liberty
