Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Archive
UN-BELIEVABLE! IS THIS THE SANE REALITY OF YOUR WORLD?
UNITED NATIONS. IT'S YOUR WORLD. ...says the slogan.
Indeed?
From the UN Department of Public Information. Glad, that they are still publishing some "informations" at least - but honestly - who reads them anymore in detail and doesn't merely rely on those tabloids of MSM-presstitutes? Although formulated very "diplomatically" there are indeed some revealing facts - if you read between the lines:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY DECIDES TO DESIGNATE 27 JANUARY AS ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL DAY
OF COMMEMORATION TO HONOUR HOLOCAUST VICTIMS
Sixtieth General Assembly
Plenary
42nd Meeting (AM)
The General Assembly today decided that the United Nations will designate 27 January -– the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz death camp [Ed.Com.: Was this indeed the genuine - "historically correct" term?] -- as an annual International Day of Commemoration to honour the victims of the Holocaust, and urged Member States to develop educational programmes to instil the memory [Ed.Com.: Still not enough...?] of the tragedy in future generations to prevent genocide from occurring again [Ed.Com.: Has anyone problems remembering less than five genocides since 1945 - not to speak of the genozide during WWII?].
Rejecting any denial of the Holocaust as a historical event, either in full or in part, the 191-member Assembly
adopted by consensus a resolution condemning “without reserve”all manifestations of religious intolerance, incitement, harassment or violence against persons or communities based on ethnic origin or religious belief, whenever they occur. [Ed.Com.: All?? Sell me a watch...]
The Assembly also requested United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan to establish an outreach programme on the “Holocaust and the United Nations”, as well as measures to mobilize civil society for Holocaust remembrance and education, in order to help prevent future acts of genocide.
[Ed.Com.: See comment above - what's with those past genozodes? Latest is still unfolding in Sudan!]
The debate on the issue stretched over two days, with delegations expressing support for the historic text
[Ed.Com.: What´s in God´s sake is an "historic text" per definition along with the warrant for accepting it as such at the same time?], which honoured the “courage and dedication shown by soldiers who liberated the concentration camps” [Ed.Com.: Hey, they just came, saw (what?) and "liberated"...], and commended countries that had worked hard to preserve those sites which served as Nazi death camps or forced labour prisons [Ed.Com.: Now what? Isn't THIS additional attribute "revisionistic" already?] during the Holocaust.
Introducing his country’s first-ever resolution before the Assembly
[Ed.Com.: No wonder, as Israel has been ignoring almost all of them beforehand...], Israel’s representative yesterday said it was imperative for the sanctity of life and for the preservation of humanity for all States to learn the lessons of the Holocaust, and to prevent such atrocities in the future [Ed.Com.: Hand me over a big sick bag...]. He urged the Assembly to adopt the text by consensus so that the United Nations and its Member States could demonstrate their commitment to the cause with one voice. [Ed.Com.: How "demo-c-rat-tick" of you...]
Today, Brazil’s representative said the Jewish Holocaust had been a paradigm of genocide -- a crime that had not been defined until then and one not affording legal recourse before then. Massacres prior to that tragedy could not be properly judged, and their perpetrators could not be punished, including crimes committed against the indigenous peoples of the Americas during the colonial period, along with the practice of slavery, he said. The 1948 anti-genocide Convention was the starting point of the needed definition
[Ed.Com.: Who "needs" this?]. Now the crime had been incorporated into the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. [Ed.Com.: That one that Israel's "leader" has been ignoring on Sabra and Shatila...]
Sixty years on, it was still difficult for the vast majority of Member States to examine their own national histories
[Ed.Com.: No wonder, with all this "revisionism" all the times...] , particularly modern histories, said Jordan’s representative. [Ed.Com.: ...and if you don't believe, go and book a wedding suite in Amman's SAS-Radisson Hotel...] And if genocide was to be made a truly unthinkable occurrence in the future, not only must countries confront their own philosophies of negation, but they must also collectively support the Court, the only permanent judicial body designed to end impunity for the gravest of crimes.
While all speakers backed the general thrust
[Ed.Com.: ...Nicely said, "thrust"...] of the draft, there were calls for its scope to be expanded beyond the specific events surrounding the Holocaust to incorporate not only the lessons of that tragedy, but also other war crimes, acts of genocide or ethnic cleansing, such as had been witnessed in the Balkans and Rwanda. Indonesia’s representative was among those condemning the Holocaust, while stressing that history registered a long list of human tragedies. It would be preferable if the intention to institute Holocaust remembrance within the United Nations system also gave simultaneous attention to other tragedies, he said. [Ed.Com.: So there have been some other too. Sounds, as these were the voices of the "opponents" of this stunt. Nice words! And, why no "applause" on THAT?]
Wrapping up the discussion
[Ed.Com.: In "clearspeak" - he did stop those intentions...], Assembly President Jan Eliasson of Sweden said the Holocaust had been a turning point in history, which had prompted the world to say “never again”. The significance of the resolution adopted today was that it called for a remembrance of past crimes with an eye towards preventing them in the future. [Ed.Com.: Dear Mr.Elias'-son, go quick for Sudan and prove your words true...]
Also speaking today were...
(snip)
...Action on Draft Resolution
The Assembly took up the resolution on the Holocaust Remembrance (document A/60/L.12) and
adopted it without a vote.....
etc., etc...
So, it was "adopted without a vote" - but let's leave the PR-part and have a look at what was "voted" actually....
United Nations A/60/L.12
General Assembly Distr.: Limited
26 October 2005
Original: English
05-57270 (E) 271005
*0557270*
Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala,
Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg,
Madagascar, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Monaco, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay and Uzbekistan: draft resolution Holocaust remembrance
The General Assembly,
Reaffirming the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
1 which proclaims that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, religion or other status, Recalling article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person,
Recalling also article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
2 which state that everyone has the right to freedom of thought
[Ed.Com.: That's now really laughable - yeah "freedom of thought" -but not the freedom of EXPRESSING THOSE...], conscience and religion,
__________________
1 Resolution 217 A (III).
2 See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
2
A/60/L.12
Bearing in mind that the founding principle of the Charter of the United Nations, “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war” [Ed.Com.: Tell me, exactly since when is the UN already in charge of that idea to "save"...?], is testimony to the indelible link between the United Nations and the unique tragedy of the Second World War,
Recalling the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 3 which was adopted in order to avoid repetition of genocides such as those committed by the Nazi Regime, Recalling also the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, Taking note of the fact that the sixtieth session of the General Assembly is taking place during the sixtieth year of the defeat [Ed.Com.: Are you sure about that "formulation"....?] of Nazi regime, Recalling the twenty-eighth special session of the General Assembly, a unique event, held in commemoration of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps, Honouring the courage and dedication shown by the soldiers [Ed.Com.: Ouchhh, "courage"...?] who liberated the concentration camps, Reaffirming that the Holocaust, which resulted in the murder of one third of the Jewish people [Ed.Com.: Isn't that to be called "revisionism" already...?] along with countless members of other minorities, will forever be a warning to all people of the dangers of hatred, bigotry, racism and prejudice,
1. Resolves that the United Nations will designate 27 January as an annual International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust;
[Ed.Com.: And what about those "other" victims as promised along the intro of all this...?]
2. Urges Member States to develop educational programmes that will inculcate future generations with the lessons of the Holocaust
[Ed.Com.: So, all the same what kind of "genozide" will be pulled off on us in future - it will be always those promotors of the Holocaust who will compare and be in charge to judge about our OWN genozides. Do you regard this as a "clever" move? - I bet you do...] in order to help prevent future acts of genocide, and in this context commends the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research; [Ed.Com.: If this event has been so "unique" and outstanding - then why take it as a "measurement" of "future acts of genozide" - which b.t.w. shouldn't have a big probability of occuring anymore - due to this "new superduper UN-banning of genozides"...? Sell me another watch!]
3. Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part;
[Ed.Com.: Aha, here comes the "meat" again. Isn't this in CONTRADICTION of article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights where one has the FREEDOM OF THOUGHTS - but perhaps not of TELLING? LOL!]
4. Commends those States which have actively engaged in preserving those sites that served as Nazi death camps, concentration camps, forced labour camps and prisons during the Holocaust;
5. Condemns without reserve all manifestations of religious intolerance,incitement, harassment or violence against persons or communities based on ethnic origin or religious belief, wherever they occur;
[Ed.Com.: We had that one before - "condemning" is clear - but what about the consequnces in THOSE cases? A fiction of delivering - e.g. PM Sharon (just randomly chosen, without any intention of connecting to any real persons) - to Gaza? Sell me another...]
6. Requests the Secretary-General to establish a programme of outreach on the subject of the “Holocaust and the United Nations” as well as measures to mobilize civil society for Holocaust remembrance and education, in order to help
prevent future acts of genocide
[Ed.Com.: Again the "whitewashing" and "masking" of the "meat"...], to report to the General Assembly on the establishment of this programme within six months from the date of the adoption of the present resolution and to report thereafter on the implementation of the programme at its sixty-third session.
To get things right - I am NOT "doubting" the official version of the Holocaust - as there IS an official version out there - (which might be similar as to what is "officially" stated on the 9/11, the Gulf of Tonkin, etc.) - whether now those were "death camps" or "labor-camps" - as I am a person who abides laws - although those are often "lows" to me. I am only asking rightful questions, and I want to like to draw my conclusions for myself - after having studied ALL AVAILABLE FACTS. And I want you to participate on my journey through this - so I'll share with you ALL my findings on that "rollercoaster-ride" through MYstory - which is often much more conclusive than HISstory.
After all, fiction tells us often more than - so called - "reality".
The IRC, at minimum, monitored Auschwitz throughout 1944 and into '45 and reported no irregularities.
The crimes alleged to have been committed at the "extermination camps" were "proven" only by eyewitness testimonies, many suborned, the rest hearsay. No scientific evidence was introduced to support the accusations. Only in 1978 with the publication of Dr. Butz's book was a scientific examination of the "evidence" conducted, which conclusively demonstrated that the primary accusations, extermination gas chambers and crematoria, to dispose of the evidence, were not only baseless, but scientifically absurd.
Rudolf Hoess, the former commandant at Auschwitz, "confessed" to murdering 2.5 million inmates, under torture by his captor, one Sgt. Bernard Clarke, between March 11 and March 15-16, 1946. Hoess was judicially murdered a year later. Clarke, "a successful businessman" still alive and living in the south of England.
This was "ground zero" for the promulgation of the Holocaust legend.
As for the "crime" of forced labor, any American prison may stand accused of the same, with the single difference, that instead of paying inmates with prison scrip, the latter pay in a scrip masquerading as the American Dollar.
The Holocaust Remembrance Day resolution introduced by UN Representative Gillerman was the first Israeli resolution in the history of that "parliament." Israel has ignored the 250 or so other resolutions passed against it by the same body.
The resolution was passed without a formal vote.
It appears that not a single UN representative opposed the measure, excepting the few who added that all incidents of genocide should be accorded equal status for remembrance. Not a single representative objected that the Holocaust itself should be more carefully defined as to the HARD evidence available in the historical record supplied by Revisionist historians.
This constitutes wholesale political intimidation.
The evidential litmus tests: There IS a simple rule in American jurisprudence, that if a witness tells one single lie, the jury is at liberty to disregard the witness's testimony. The multiple mendacities of the Holocaust lobby are a well-established fact.
As for determining the veracity of propaganda/counter-propaganda: Juries are also, in capital cases, instructed to find defendants innocent, if they entertain any reasonable doubt as to their guilt.
Literally hundreds of American jurists quit their participation in the Nuremberg Trials, for judicial irregularities and outright judicial fraud. Francis Parker Yockey was among them. Spencer Tracey was not.
The Red Cross Visit to Theresienstadt on June 23, 1944: If Auschwitz was a "death camp," then why was it also a slave labor camp? Was skilled labor so plentiful that the Germans elected to work their prison populations to death? Do slave owners destroy their property? Would they have provided medical care for inmates, if this was their objective? Would they have permitted the delivery by the IRC of 1.2 million aid packages?
Was the presentation of Theresienstadt a propaganda ploy? The writer reveals that the British disseminated "information" on genocide of Jews throughout the war. Could not the beautification of this former ghetto be a counter-propaganda ploy?...
The UN also has a "beautification project" called the UNDP.
In Rousse Bulgaria, they restored the main square and the surrounding buildings. What was never "beautified" was the once thriving industrial district on Rousse's outskirts, which degenerated into ruins.
Best...
Hadashi
Read more about the implications of this all at these connected links:
If, I repeat - IF - the memorial of the Holocaust will be used for a "never again" of genozides - regardless of ethics, religion or whatever of those future victims - than - and ONLY THAN - it would be not NECCESSARY of asking further questions about what really happened and all those "lectures" would make sense and serve as a proper lecture for whole mankind.
Until that day - when this all will be PROVED BY ACTIONS of the UN - and not merely by "words" that have a smell of ambiguity - and (sic!) not only by "remembering" the Holocaust - there will be always people who will put questions.
After all - challenging "proven facts" and asking questions is extremely human. It starts with any child...
I almost hear Galileo whispering, "And yet it [the earth] does move." Far Sight 3
