Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
The ORIGINAL ARTICLE is in bold, blue - my personal comments and reply to the unknown journaillist - who did write this all - are in "plain" right afterwards...
To the unknown author of:
La La Pelosi
Ibd
Fri Jul 1,
7:00 PM ET
War On Terror: Saying that Saddam Hussein had no role in the operational planning for 9-11 is like saying that Adolf Hitler had no role in the operational planning for the attack on Pearl Harbor. And the point is?
Assuming that Karl Rove has no role in this Govt. and has never met Michael Ledeen (No, that's NOT Bin Laden - this guy is called Tim Osmann) - who doesn't know what the AIPAC is - would be more appropriate than linking the "double" in underwear to anything with 9/11. Although there MIGHT BE A CONNECTION: They all have been supervized and steered by the help of various secret services.
Reagarding Pearl Harbor we shouldn't look too much for Adolf but instead more at the U.S. Govt. of that time and their forknowledge and mingelings that lead into the PLANNED PEARL HARBOR-"LET-IT-HAPPEN-WE-CAN-USE-IT-ATTACK"...
So to see - it might be legitimate to compare the 9/11 with what really happened at Pearl Harbor...
References to 9-11 infuriate Democrats and their un-indicted co-conspirators in the media because they put the focus where it belongs -- on 3,000 lives being snuffed out by murderous thugs who plant car bombs outside training hospitals and fly passenger jets into skyscrapers, and not on whether the air conditioning at Gitmo is turned up too high.
Who are the real "conspirators" here? The biggest conspiracy here is the "official" 'Omission Report on 9/11 itself and to quote and referring to his liability leads more to lie-ability. And a little personal sidenote to the author of this masterpiece of rabble-journaillism: How did you get to know this thing with the "air conditioning"? Didn't you just break any gag-order by "revealing" this "important item of national security"? Or do you live in a really "hot" state and you are just suffering from a severe sunburn? My best wishes for your recovering...! I feel really sorry for you.
They're upset because it reminds us who our enemies really are -- the bin Ladens and Zarqawis of the world, not Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush. It also reminds us that for all their "are-we-there-yet?" whining they have no strategy to fight terror, other than providing lawyers for captured jihadists and setting a date certain for our surrender, uh , withdrawal.
Did I hear again "Leeden"? Did I sense AIPAC? Did I hear anything on what might even sound like REALITY? Not in this paragraph! But perhaps in the next one...
After President Bush's speech to the troops at Fort Bragg, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi opined that the president "is willing to exploit the sacred ground of 9-11, knowing there is no connection between 9-11 and the war in Iraq." That country, she also claimed, "is now what it was not when the war began -- a magnet for terrorism." So where should the "magnet for terrorism" be? An American city?
Hey dude, this is nothing geographical, although you might to see it that way! Locusts don't have a "house" - they fly to - wherever they do think there is "food" available. The "magnet of terrorism" - as you state it - is caused by the bunch of "Errorism" - the lack of knowledge, what is really happening...
Democrats who objected to President Bush's references to 9-11 on the grounds that there was no link between Iraq and 9-11 are both wrong and miss the point. Saddam's Iraq, al-Qaida and other states and terrorist groups were and are linked by their common enemy and their common goal: They want the United States destroyed. They are allies as much as Germany, Japan and Italy were allies in World War II. They may not coordinate every jot and tittle of their efforts, but the enemy of their enemy is their friend.
You forgot to mention the international finance groups who are behind all this. Saddam didn't want to "destroy" America - as he often mentioned and I remember he even proposed a fist-fight between him and Bush to settle the matter (LOL - Now, that's what I call "creative warfare"...). Wanna know, WHO wants America to be "destroyed"? Better write about the jobs and whole industries that are just "transferred" towards China. Or read more RMN...
That there were links was confirmed by 9-11 commission Vice Chairman Thomas Kean, who said: "There were contacts between Iraq and al-Qaida, a number of them, some of them a little shadowy. They were definitely there."
If the sun of knowledge stands low, even dwarfs - like Kean - throw huuuuge shadows...
Indeed there were. For example, Abdul Rahman Yasin, a member of the al-Qaida cell that detonated the 1993 World Trade Center bomb, found safe haven in Iraq and documents recently found in Tikrit indicate Saddam provided Yasin with both a home and a salary. Why?
if i remember right - this 1993-thing was infiltrated by FBI-agents. Another "let-it-happen-we-can-use-it". And if you ask "why"- I can tell you, it's simple: Because both Saddam and Yasin had the same "comptrollers"...
The Clinton Justice Department alleged in a 1998 indictment against bin Laden that "al-Qaida reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al-Qaida would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al-Qaida would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."
Sounds more like AL-CIAda to me then...
Perhaps Pelosi has an explanation for Iraqi intelligence operative Ahmed Hikmat Shaker's helping one of the 9-11 hijackers get to Malaysia and attending the Kuala Lampur meeting in January 2000 with two of the hijackers, a meeting roundly acknowledged to be the initial 9-11 planning session?...
Perhaps you have any "explanation" for why U.S.-officials met with Bin Laden in the summer before the 9/11 when he was under treatment and on the "most wanted"-list? Perhaps you may have another "explanation" why the identity of those "Atta and the 19 thieves" was faked and everything that would throw more light on the sad happenings of the 9/11 is "under national security"???
I think I will stop here. For your understanding - I am no "democrat" as I am no "alcohol", "liberal" or whatsoever because I am not labeling people by the drug they are consuming. So I will stop calling you "journalist" - as you might have consumed too much of this...
Dear unknown journalist! I wish you soon to recover from your "Sunburns" - or was it even a severe sunstroke ...?...
