A reminder to those interested, that the battleship Maine was blown in Havana harbor and some say it was a pretext / excuse for the U.S. declaration of War against Spain (which was a cake-walk) to/for acquiring the Philippines , Cuber and Puerta Rica . It was claimed at the time(yellow journalism ?) to be a Terrorist bomb .Rally the People! That was the Spanish-American war . Then we have the Pearl Harbor "sneak" attack . Then we have the "New" Pearl Harbor 'scenario', for the World Trade Center Attack on , 'American soil', as the pre-text for Iraq and Entry into Sovereign Nations globally , to root out Terrorists and the " Patriot ( never 'read' or quacked on , by Congressional capons , but Passed , approved ) Act " to investigate , watch, and arrest , Citizens or other suspicious humans in Domestic U. S. of A. . Founding FATHERS said: Beware of intervening in Foreign Affairs. Don't meddle in other sovereign Nation's Business and conflicts. The C.I.A. operating ( against its Charter )'inside' the United States ; the F.B.I. operating on Foreign soil with , or without permission / clearance from that Nation's Government . Amazing . Don't Mess with The U.S., eh ? We're Number ONE ! Whatever it takes to turn the crank ! Situational Ethics ? MEANWHILE_______ in and around Federal Military Hospitals in the D.C.AREA : Automobiles ARE BEING Impounded AT Walter Reed Hospital belonging to Disabled Iraqi War young Veterans visiting , for treatment , prosthetics ,etc . Coming out , finding their cars gone . DUTY HONOR COUNTRY ."Woe to the Nation that ignores its War dead and Disabled."old Latin inscription - somewhere. Amazing. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ : The USS Carl Vinson, the next 9/11 target? Similar in design
: to the "retired" USS America it's fate may be
: that one of a "sitting duck" in the Gulf. May
: those brave sailors be protected from those kinds of
: heinous acts and remain alert if they want to serve their
: country well...
: Al-Qaeda, Iran and the next 9/11
: (16.06.2005)
: The propaganda from the U.S. has been growing at an increasing
: rate against Iran, with attempts to tie them to al-Zarqawi,
: Osama bin Laden, other terrorists that hide there and of
: course nuclear weapons.
: Most people have come to accept that the Bush administration
: will be involved in an attack on Iran, the only question is
: when?
: We have seen for some time the so called "growing
: evidence" that the administration have provided, that
: is designed to convince others that Iran is a country that
: must be "dealt with"
: Like the situation with Saddam Hussein and Iraq, the U.S. are
: supplying information in preparation for an attack. In the
: case of Iraq, the excuse was "weapons of mass
: destruction", but as we have seen in the "Downing
: Street Memo", plans for the invasion were being
: created before the subject of WMD arose, this was simply
: the best excuse they could find at the time .
: Even though the WMD were never found in Iraq [Ed.Comm.:
: I still think they were removed in time from a faction
: opposed to America...] , a number of different reasons for
: Hussein's removal were offered afterwards to justify the
: invasion. An attack plotted between the Bush administration
: and the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
: Whilst the Bush administration would love to use the same
: routine on Iran, even they realize that this might be just
: a little too obvious . They have of course pushed the
: "nuclear" aspect hard and this much is the same
: as the WMD angle used on Iraq.
: This alone would not be sufficient to gain backing for an
: attack and they have therefore added the ingredient of
: terrorists hiding in Iran. Reports issued at the beginning
: of this month claimed that terrorists were hiding in Iran
: and that maybe al-Zarqawi was one of them . In the last
: couple of days news reports have been promoting the idea
: that Osama bin Laden may also be there! But of course these
: reports can not be verified, however the information comes
: from sources that we are supposed to
: believe.[Ed.Comm.: The "Green Pimpernel" is
: drawn out of the hat of the magician almost every time when
: times are gett'n hard. As even Reuters had to
: "confess" - see:
: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L17672701.htm -
: all those "revelations" about AL-CIAeda are on
: page No.1 - while the denials by the resistance in Iraq are
: to be found on page 55 in the MSM-Medeas]
: But would the prescence of bin Laden and al-Zarqawi in Iran be
: enough to support an attack? We think not.
: We believe that there will be one more step before the
: Bush administration feel that they have "sold"
: the idea sufficiently, another 9/11.
: In our earlier articles on this subject (which were kept out
: of the main headlines), we suggested that the next 9/11
: would come in the form of an attack on an Aircraft Carrier
: in the Persian Gulf (next to Iran).
: USS America sunk in the Atlantic after explosive testsYou will
: no doubt recall that the USS America (an old Aircraft
: Carrier) was sunk in the Atlantic on the 14th May 2005,
: after 25 days of explosions. The Navy said that the
: explosive tests would provide valuable data on
: survivability for the next generation of Aircraft Carriers,
: which are now in development.
: This could of course be true, but it could also be a test to
: see what it takes to sink an Aircraft Carrier of this size.
: It is also difficult to understand how using
: "explosives" would help the design of future
: carriers, unless the Navy expect the enemy to place these
: on the ship somehow. Surely, a better test would be
: achieved by using weapons that are more likely to be used
: (like missiles for example?).
: See our thread at...
: THE SINKING OF "AMERICA"...
: FarSight3 -- Saturday, 21 May 2005,
: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=71731
: ...where we pinpointed exactly THAT scenario.
:
: But let's assume for a moment that the test had more
: "sinister" reasons and somebody wanted to know
: what it would need to sink a carrier currently on duty (say
: in the Persian Gulf?). It may surprise some people to know
: that the USS Carl Vinson is almost exactly the same size as
: the USS America. They were both built by the same company,
: are about the same length (30 foot diference), same flight
: deck area (4.5 acres), have a 5 foot difference in Beam,
: approximately 2 foot difference in Draft, similar
: displacement with a full load, both can carry 85 planes and
: require similar crew levels.
: Let's continue to speculate and imagine what would happen if
: the USS Carl Vinson was "attacked" and sunk,
: perhaps with the loss of most of its crew (which totals
: around 5,500). After a very short investigation (like in
: the WTC attack), the Bush administration announce that the
: attack was carried out by al-Zarqawi or Osama bin Laden (or
: maybe both?) and that these "terrorists" had fled
: to Iran!
: The United States would naturally demand that Iran hand over
: the "culprits", but this will be impossible to
: do, as they are not hiding there at all. This would be
: followed by threats and eventually an attack.
: The important question is whether anyone would really believe
: that al-Zarqawi or Osama bin Laden were responsible, or
: that they were "hiding" in Iran. Surely, that
: would be too much of a coincidence, wouldn't it?
:
: As we have already stated (see our previous article), Osama
: bin Laden is stuck in a place near Chitral in Pakistan, and
: would find it almost impossible to move anywhere (let alone
: Iran). That's not to say that bin Laden would not have a
: hand in any attack, but only because of his
: "connections" and under instruction from those
: higher up (we think you know who?)
: It is important to mention that Osama bin Laden's "al
: Qaeda" network was set up with funding from the CIA,
: to fight the left-wing government of Afghanistan after it
: came to power in 1978 (this also included assistance from
: Pakistan). Many are led to believe that the US fell out
: with bin Laden in 1990, but did they?
: George Bush was not in power at the time and this relationship
: (with people that are now classed as terrorists), was
: created by the real power behind the US government. The
: politician's are merely a public face to the powerful
: business people that are really controlling the country.
:
: Some will remember that "Naval targets" are not new
: to the game. TheUSS Cole after the attack USS Cole was
: "attacked" on the 12th of October, 2000 by what
: were believed to be terrorists. However, the evidence to
: support this is not that clear and three terrorist groups
: claimed responsibility. Some believe that the explosion was
: from within the ship and not caused by a bomb carried in a
: boat used by two suicide bombers.[Ed.Comm.: I think a
: missile at the right time had done the "job"...]
: Whilst US officials seemed capable of carrying out DNA tests
: on the remains of alleged terrorists bodies (incredibly
: small pieces), they were unable to decide whether the boat
: was an inflatable, or made from fibreglass! And that old
: villian, Osama bin Laden, was once again tied into this
: attack.
:
: As we have said earlier about an attack on Iran, it is not a
: case of if, but when. Perhaps, if we publicize our fears
: widely enough, those responsible may think twice about
: using such tactics. But somehow we think not and it is
: therefore up to the rest of the world to see, and uncover,
: the real truth and punish the culprits who are really to
: blame this time.
: In the meantime, the crew of the USS Carl Vinson would be wise
: to keep a close eye on any unusual "items" placed
: on the ship near structural areas of importance (either
: recently, or in the near future), to avoid any surprises.
: We could be wrong about this, but we would rather be safe
: than sorry!
: ...
: Article at:
: http://www.profindpages.com/news/2005/06/16/MN983.htm
:
: Be rather safe than sorry! Pleeeze!
: Far Sight 3
Serving Freedom
and Liberty
