Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Archive
FORMER BUSH-TEAM-MEMBER SPEAKS OF"WTC-CONTR.DEMOLITION"
After the crash of the WTC towers the next to crumble will be the "house of lies" promoted by the "o-fficial" 9/11 omission-report...
Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'In Posted on Sunday, June 12 @ 12:18:45 EDT by drew
9-11 Highly recognized former chief economist in Labor Department now doubts official 9/11 story, claiming suspicious facts and evidence cover-up indicate government foul play and possible criminal implications.
June 12, 2005
By Greg Szymanski
A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.
"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds this week from his offices at Texas A&M. "If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
"More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right."
However, Reynolds said "getting it right in today's security state' remains challenging because he claims explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of 9/11....
More and more evidence is now emerging that the explosives in the towers were placed long before the actual 9/11 (was the 2003-'error-act a deliberate "pre-test" and a desigend opportunity for placing new explosives or/and Thermite into the basement?).
According to the rumors that there exists a city-law that ALL N.Y. skyscrapers are "equipped" with demolition devices due to protection of the surrounding buildings in case of danger (if building topples more than 8° it is brought down...) - the WTC was as well equipped with this kinda "preparation". The explosives were said to be working officially as "protective paint" for the steel parts - again coated by concrete...
Is that the reason why everything was "pulverized"?
Be sure to read as well the last part of three on:
