Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Archive
BOLTON TO "MILITARIZE" UN & WOLFIE "PENTAGONIZING" WB..
The excerpt from Bob Chapman firsthand, followed by a broader historical view from Hadashi:
"....John Bolton is being put in place to militarize the UN and Paul Wolfowitz is going to bring Pentagon thinking to the World Bank.
Both individuals emphasize militance. George and his neocons evidently believe that the UN and the World Bank are going to come to the assistance of his collapsing occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and his collapsing economy. It is a little late for that, conspirators.
The money is not available for either, never mind both.
No matter which way you look George is stretched every which way.
That means Wolfie will be pouring money into Iraq and Israel.
Not loans, but grants, which are not repayable.
If after members, like the Europeans complain, he will simply tell them he will invade them or at best make their lives miserable. That means the European elitists could back a coup or have George whacked. If you ever wondered why Stanley Fischer of MIT and the IMF is now a newly minted Israeli citizen and head of the Israeli Central Bank, you can now understand, the world bank is going to subsidize war and occupation and finance Israel as it expands throughout the region.
This is all an extension of US and Israeli looting as well.
The move will be reminiscent of the Harvard sponsored looting of Russia after the Wall fell. The Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization will be the vehicle from this end to accumulate the loot. Those in charge will all be ex-Marxists. What a cozy den of thieves. Ideology means nothing – it is the money stupid..."
Good points. Read now Hadashi's thoughts, connected and woven into the fabric of history:
The Greatest Game
Let us look at how matters stood a century ago, to predict where the Great Parasites will attempt to take us in the near and more distant future....
At the beginning of the twentieth century the USA was a growing manufacturing country with a relatively much smaller capital surplus available for reinvestment.
At the end of the twentieth century, the USA had BEEN BANKRUPTED, with a much diminished manufacturing base and vast capital surpluses, WHICH ARE BUT FINANCIAL AND FICTITIOUS.
In between some twenty nations had been rebuilt (advanced manufacturing states ruined by war and then economically captured) or developed from scratch, ON THE EXPANDING MONETARY BASE OF THE "AMERICAN" DOLLAR.
Compare Russia then, before and after the "Russian" Revolution and America now, before the coming crash and after: Under the Czars, Russia was a wealthy non-manufacturing country with an hereditary aristocracy and a net exporter of grains. After the revolution, one elite, placed in power by foreign agents, had supplanted the indigenous elite. Russia was rebuilt on Five Year Plans which employed STATE CAPITALIST INDUSTRIES AND COLLECTIVIZED INDUSTRIAL-TYPE FARMING.
The capital (financial and technological) for this new economy was supplied by the Western partners of the Soviet Communist nomenklatura.
The United States is now perilously close to the brink of becoming a state WHICH CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE SOVIET UNION and contemporary Russia.
Its most conspicuous features:
1) a Dollar as debauched as the Rouble, and soon to be restricted in its circulation to domestic markets
2) an impoverished commercial sector deficient in manufacturing power of consumer goods
3) a highly bureaucratized state sector with an over-developed military.
Moreover, when the US Dollar collapses, international financing of its twin deficits will cease, leaving it dependent upon "the kindness of strangers."
To begin the international looting game anew, the Great Parasites must find a new host. Europe? The most logical candidate. The refusal of the EU "constitution" is but a setback, a wrinkle in time, as the linchpin is already in place: the Euro. ("Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws." Baron Meyer v. Rothschild, 1838) The latter is the "two steps forward" of economic union for the one step back of the recent failure to effect political union.
The outcome of this strategy will be the same as before: China and India will continue in their role as net importers of inflation, while exploiting the wage arbitrage factor, to Europe's detriment.
And the US? It is to be cast in the pariah role of the Soviet Union, a "neo-fascist" state working from a much diminished capital base, much as Germany of the 1930's, but with the signal difference, that the US is not to be allowed to rise again but will be compelled to sink into a condition of economic stagnancy and authoritarianism on a Stalinist model.
Our standard of living will fall dramatically as it converges on the Chinese model, which will rise to meet us "in the middle." It will not have far to rise, it appears.
For Europe, the Thatcherite neoconservative economic model will become irresistible, UNLESS and only UNLESS there is COUNTER-revolution.
What hangs in the balance: Russia, Japan, Germany, and France. France especially. If the French had shown prescience in 1941 and taken the side of Germany, breaking its alliance with the Allies and resisting both England and the United States, and brought the Soviets with them, Europe would not be faced today with an ultimatum.
Europe is at the crossroads. Will she kiss the ring or refuse the bribe?