Reader Hadashi writes:
Let us examine the assertions made by my esteemed correspondent, and with all due respect, again place these events in deeper perspective:
Since we have agreed that the "next phase" (Bolshevist) dynamic we now see unfolding in Washington as a DIALECTICAL one, and one which in its OVERALL character must be described as Trotskyite, remember, it takes two to tango: THE CONTENDING FORCES ARE STILL DIVISIBLE INTO TWO CAMPS, INTERNATIONALIST AND NATIONALIST.
Stand back, far back, and look over the historical topography...
Iran is STILL a nation, BUT one that was politically radicalized by the Ayatollahs in 1979, and RMN readers should be familiar by now with the HISTORICAL origins of this RADICALLY "ISLAMIC" FUNDAMENTALIST Pan-Arab movement. And its purpose...
Ruses in force:
Firstly, it is not a case of "Let Iran Have Nukes," for...
1) they in all probability already have them, or
2) will get them all the same. Fait accompli.
But this is not about nukes...
Secondly, the assertion that the Iraq war was conducted prematurely is contradicted by the long, preliminary planning for this conflict, not beginning but concluding with the American Enterprise Institute's "Wilsonian" (viz. International Socialist, Colonel "Housean") "Project For A New American Century" white paper, issued in 1997, and signed by neocon "illuminaries": Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, James Bolton, Zalmay M. Khalilzad, William Bennett, Dan Quayle, Jeb Bush...
...and endorsed by Brzezinski, the "Grand Chessboard" strategist.
NOTE: The Neocon "mouth organ", The Weekly Standard, founded in 1995, is located on the same premises as the AEI. To put it BLUNTLY, its managing editor, Bill Krystol, comes from a long line of Communists.
The fundamental tenet of the Grand Chessboard thesis is: That power which controls the Eurasian land mass controls the world. This principle was formulated by Round Table member and geopolitician, John Halford Mackinder, Democratic Ideals and Reality (1904), in which he propounded the view of Eurasia as the geographical pivot and "heartland of history."
Mackinder is remembered for his "kindergarten" of Coefficients, the Fabianists, whose emblem is a wolf in sheep's clothing, and included such notables as HG Wells. Mackinder was also a director of the London School of Economics, which includes among its "illustrious" alumni, Georg Soros.
Now, why does the identity of the SYNTHESIZING "third force" always go missing in any MSM analysis of the subject? Does anyone at this moment in time need to be informed as to the TRUE identity of the stealth imperialists? Have they not made their the orientation of their ideology abundantly clear through the preceding 100 years?
Was this Ian Fleming's "Specter"?
Thirdly, China is most certainly up and running at full speed. With nearly USD 700 billion in reserves, courtesy of our "Free Trade" policy, China has concluded military and trade agreements over the last year with the following countries: Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Russia, India, Bolivia, Ecuador...and now the EU is about to lift its fifteen year old arms embargo on China.
China is most certainly now mature enough to play in the big league.
(snip)
In response to this morning's post: THE BLACKMAILING OF THE US PRESIDENT:
"PLEEEEEZE stay on top of the J.P. MORGAN MERGER with HONG KONG, SHANGHAI BANK.
The MERGER is a TAKE OVER OF J.P. MORGAN-CHASE when JPM-CHASE GOT CAUGHT WITH THE "COUNTERFEIT BONUS 3329-181 U.S. DEBT INSTRUMENTS" put out by GLOBAL ALLIANCE INVESTMENT (EKKER'S)."
Look very carefully at this heroin bank, HKSB, whose history can be traced back to the Opium Wars and the British East India Co., and its ownership...and ask:
Why was the English Pound not selected as the Global Reserve Currency at Bretton Woods? (For the same reason that US Dollar-denominated bills of exchange flooded the international money markets before 1929?)
And then ask yourselves, SERIOUSLY: Has anyone still using the "F" word (You know who you are) not suffered an overdose (BDOB: Brain Dead On Arrival) of Tom Clancy melopolitical thrillers?
-HADASHI-
Thx - profund as always...;-)... Some remarks:
Firstly, it is not a case of "Let Iran Have Nukes" - agree - as I wrote it's about trying to slow down the 'speed' of the war-train demagocically...
Secondly, the assertion that the Iraq war was conducted prematurely is contradicted by the long, preliminary planning for this conflict... - True, it was planned long ago and with all possible scenarios, and I do like your comparison naming "the third force" SPECTER (reads revised... "RED-CAPS"? ...LOL...), but: I didn't state it was done "prematurely" - it was done SOONER than it might have been the 'optimal' time for the NWO-GLOBALIST-PROMOTERS. And I am sure that moreover there was a deliberate setup within the Govt./military by - sending - not enough troops, deliberately 'miscalculating' the resistance and channeling lots of 'bogus' information into the intel-system (as by the construct of OSP). It looked all like a big theatre - and the 'usual' lambs were sacrificed on the battlefield...
Thirdly, you meant - China is "most certainly up and running at full speed". Compared with about five years ago - you might be right - but I am sure NO NATION WANTS A WAR - except it is felt 'steered' into and wants TO DEFEND its own interests. And if you watch the latest happenings in the pacific-theatre - started by 'terrorists' around the Phillipines, then the devasting Tsunami - it seems to be clear that those sinister forces behind the U.S.-Govt. wanted this to happen DELIBERATELY - for the sake of 'cutting' off the 'oil-path' to China and for gaining 'strategic ground' - similar to what was done with Japan before the (constructed) hell broke loose over Pearl Harbor...
Far Sight 3
Serving Freedom
and Liberty
