: Curious. What nationality would you rather he be?
: And, what are you afraid of?
: Thanks,
: LadyM
Thank you too, for the questions. I have noted your participation in public dialog; seeing your post brings up gratitude. I'm doing this because I'm driven to learn more of the truth. I know you will contribute.
The Israeli citizenship is to me not very informative. Other facets likely related to that might tell us much more. No, nationality is not a concern in my reckoning. And the mere fact of being born on Planet Earth is not proof that one is a terrorist.
To paraphrase, you've misoverstood my purpose in drawing attention to something I see. These questions were worded to be as ambiguous as possible, leaving openings so that supporters and doubters would both have compelling answers. We won't find all true info or all false info, but a mix and together we can get more of it sooner and discern what's true with the power of the group mind that can work so well in a situation like this.
Until the last breath comes I can't guarantee that I don't have a fear of death, but it's much clearer that I'm not afraid of what we are learning about the direction of America and the family of nations.
A stronger motivation is to support each of us to be able to have a more inclusive view of the world arena. Once the truth becomes known humanity won't be afflicted with division. When we get clear about the priorities and all the options, we'll know what's optimal and the force of mass-awareness can drive the outcomes like ivan driver.
* * *
Some elaboration of the questions I worded minimally:
Why is the concealment of links and associations so permeable (links and associations of all of the first 5 appointments, not the only Big N considered in isolation)?
Might this be by design (obviously, parentage and citizenship would be the first place an investigator would look, and the parallel indicators for the other four were likewise not too inconvenient to uncover)?
What is the intended result (if these indicators are so obvious and easy to find for us to find, then WHO would be the target of deception)?
Is the staged message a deceit (public gestures and direct statements on the European tour thus far do not mesh with the indicated ideology behind these appointments)?
If it is a deceipt what is concealed and what purpose is served (if what's indicated is a misrepresentation, what is the veiled intention)?
Isn't the list of direct honest representations rather short(are we to presume that what's represented in these first appointments is intended as a largely transparent facade)?
Why would this representation be an exception?
