This just beamed in by my ET colleague Michael Salla, author of 'ExoPolitics':
================================================================
"Aloha All, I just read an article basically arguing that there is
little policy difference between George Bush and John Kerry, and
that neither offers a long term solution to the ills of US Society.
http://rense.com/general59/bnusk.htm I think that's an argument many
have made including Ralph Nader, and I think many of us on the forum
would agree with that assessment. Yet we know that it will be only
Bush or Kerry who win the Presidency so those who vote are trapped
into making a decision to vote with their heart for the third party
candidate who won't win, or follow their head and possibly make a
difference for the major party candidate who will win. It's an
agonizing choice for many, choosing between the lesser of two evils
to make a difference or following your heart. Well it's worth
reflecting on the election in terms of disclosure of the ET presence
and where the two major candidates stand.
Basically, George Bush's administration has been one of the most
secretive on record. Keeping out of the public arena many documents
and policy making processes that had become more public under the
Clinton administration. Many of the initiatives undertaken by
Clinton to make the US government more transparent, and to enable
more classified documents to be automatically de-classified and
released were overturned by the Bush administration. Even
Congressional committees had a tough time getting public access to
classified documents as the 911 Commission discovered. The Bush
administation is well known as being the most secretive on record.
On the other hand, a Kerry administration would be much more open
and transparent, and could be expected to restore many of the
Clinton initiatives to have classified documents automatically
declassified and released in many cases where the national security
of the US wasn't compromised. Kerry throughout his tenure has been a
stalwart in getting Congressional committees to have more access to
classified documents that have public interest such as MIA's, and to
have these released. This leads to the critical question of who
between Kerry and Bush would play the most constructive role in
public disclosure of the most important secret of the US government,
the undisclosed extraterrestrial presence.
I believe that the majority of evidence points to a major policy
schism between two dominant factions of those secretly managing the
extraterrestrial presence. There is a hardline faction that is
deeply nationalistic and believes in a strong military response to
the ET presence. This faction has very little trust in those ETs who
are playing a major role in interacting with government agencies in
terms of secret agreements, deep black projects, and who interact
with the US population. That in particular means ET races from Zeta
Reticulum, the Grays, who dominate abduction accounts and
whistleblower testimonies concerning ETs. This hardline faction is
well represented in the approach of the Bush administration which is
dominated by neo-conservatives and of course believes in a strong
military response to threats to the US and is intensely
nationalistic. A public disclosure of the ET presence by such a
faction would tend to be one depicting the ETs, Grays, as hostile
and untrustworthy. It would be most likely formulated in terms of a
national security crisis.
Individuals like Douglas McCarther and Ronald Reagan stand out as
those who have supported such a hardline approach. Keeping the ET
presence a secret would thus be a logical choice for such a faction
who would feel threatened if such ETs began openly interacting with
the general public. Secrecy would thus enable the general public to
remain uninformed so that if a policy decision was ever made
to 'take out' the Grays using captured and reverse engineered
technology, then this could be initiated. After all, more than five
decades of secret military development of ET technology may give
this hardline faction some confidence in their military capacity to
take on the Grays. It would be likely that disclosure would thus
follow a contrived crisis as Stephen Greer has described.
http://disclosureproject.com/cosmicdeception.htm
On the other hand, there is another faction of controllers that are
much more sympathetic to the Gray ETs who believe that the US would
have much to gain from cooperating with the Grays in technology
exchanges and other 'mutually beneficial' ways. This faction is more
internationalist in outlook and less committed to a military
response that provides security to the US. In short, this faction
believes that the Grays can make reliable 'partners' if
not 'friends', and are therefore willing to promote a more
benevolent depiction of the Grays.
This more internationalist perspective and ET-friendly approach is
supported by Democratic administrations who tend to get their
ideological support from think tanks such as the Council of Foreign
Relations and internationalist organizations such as the Trilateral
Institute, and the Bilderberg Society. So a Kerry administration
would be likely to promote openess and disclosure of ETs since an
informed general public would be more likely to accept the enigmatic
Grays as 'partners'. So a Kerry administration would support greater
acclimation initiatives to get the public ready for a disclosure
annoucenenmt when the decision was finally made.
Essentially, the choice before Americans today is one where they
without realizing it, are choosing between administrations that
would favor either a hard line nationalistic and crisis approach to
ETs and disclosure, or a more internationalist and graduated
approach to ET disclosure. A Kerry administration is more likely to
release more secrets and lead to a more informed public about ET
related matters. This is essentially for creating conditions for an
inevitable disclosure announcement which emerges out of a carefully
thought through process, rather than a crisis engineered by
hardliners.
Ultimately, ET disclosure would benefit from a Kerry administration.
Yet this will not eliminate hard line factions who have very little
trust in the Gray ETs, and who are committed to a military build up
to counter a possible ET threat. Ultimately, there will need to be
much consensus building and cooperation between these two factions
for progress to happen on the ET disclosure front. Kerry is best
equipped to ensure that ET disclosure is more forthcoming and
results from an informed public, rather than a crisis announcement
that would emerge I believe from a Bush administration.
While both a Kerry and Bush administation would put their own spin
on the ET presence, I believe the Kerry spin would be less dangerous
and more genuine. I think we have a long way to go to ensure that
disclosure of the ET presence is an honest reckoning of what has
historically transpired concerning ETs. The political spin of a
Kerry adminstration supported by 'progressive managers' would be
more beneficial, than the polical spin of a Bush administration that
would produce a crisis with ETs. Howeve, it would still be a spin
that is designed to preserve the records and decisions of
individuals and groups that have kept the ET presence secret for
decadeds.
Overall, I believe that important progress can be made with the
election of a Kerry administrtion that will contribute to a more
vigorous acclimation process and eventual disclosure of the ET
presence."
In peace
Michael Salla
=========================================================
WELL - keep dreaming of that day, until that day dawns...
