: WTC May never be a fully answered or even fully investigated,
: enigma. Many times we as investigative reporters and
: writers do the story, post it and go on to other subjects.
: From week to week we have a very new readership audience
: that probably missed any given story, first time around.
: With that in mind here is a re-post of the WTC story shown
: above. I encourage others to repost, lest in the election
: frenzy, we miss the point.
: Can you say "military coup?" - sounds like some kind
: of bird, yes?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TEXT OF REPOST
WTC - I THINK SOMEBODY BLEW IT - BIG TIME.
Posted By: Free_Speak
Date: Tuesday, 17 August 2004, 7:01 p.m.
By now in any consideration of the WTC attacks, you have to just SMELL the lies. Something is most assuredly NOT as it is being represented by all the government investigations and media spin.
Why? I think somebody blew it. Big time.
I have nothing other than intuition to base this on - WHAT YOU ARE READING IS TOTAL SUPPOSITION. I am not good at Rubik's cubes or other puzzles but I DO recognize a controlled demolition when I see one. Or two. Or three. I've seen videos of demolitions in Las Vegas, Dallas and I believe now, in New York.
I want to provide you with a concept and let you draw your own conclusion. Follow the timeline. Plane crashes into building. Smoke, fire mayhem. Later, plane crahes into building #2 Smoke, fire, mayhem. They smoulder for a long time.
THEN SUDDENLY building #1 collapses - THEN SUDDENLY building #2 collapses. What is wrong with this picture? There are clues in the timelines between the aircraft impacts and the building collapses THE IMPACTS AND IMPLOSIONS (if that is what they were) should have happened TOGETHER.
Consider this scenario; Plane crashes into building and IMMEDIATELY the building is imploded. The "Hollywood special effect" is, plane hits building, building falls. Obvious cause. Obvious effect. Them dirty Arabs - er, Taliban Osama guys. Lets go bomb the Sudan, er Sadaam, er I mean AFGHANISTAN! That's it! Arabs crash our planes into the WTC and we go hit Afghanistan.
I think somebody blew it. Big time. If the sychronicity had gone as planned, the Public Including Me would have bought it at face value. As it is, we have these huge gaps of time between impacts and collapses AND the video evidennce (that's what it is - evidence) of the explosions on the floors BELOW the impacts in two separate events. The implosions SHOULD have been covered up by the planes hitting the buildings!
If it had gone off as planned WE WOULD NOT EVEN BE ASKING THESE QUESTIONS.
There's something else. The enigmatic destruction of building #7. Something is missing here. A "protagonist" if you would.
There were your basic arson fires in several buildings at WTC but not hot enough to cause structural damage. Building 7 fell OF IT'S OWN ACCORD it seems. The plane that was SUPPOSED to hit it (or the meteor or the Big Mac from Tungaska, Siberia) failed to arrive as scheduled. THEY HAD to set it off to keep the explosives or whatever else was being concealed within, from being dicovered. No?
Whatever, the rhythm was not right.
Perhaps key players did not correctly set their watches. Maybe daylight savings time threw them off 45 minutes or so on their international settings. Maybe detonation devices failed. Maybe there was a military coup going on in the US at the time and they wanted to see how that would work out. Smell that? Maybe the aircraft that hit the Pentagon (another enigma) was supposed to have hit building 7 instead.
I think somebody blew it. Big time.
Free_Speak
-30-
