"It has beenconclusively proved that DU Weapons are Radioactive , Omnicidal nuclear weapons(the by product of the uranium enrichment process of manufacture of nuclear weapons and nuclearfuel ) used as weapons of "silent genocide" in Afghanistan,Iraq andthe Balkans and destructive of all life on earth; irreversibly altering the genetic code of all exposed"
See Below:
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR AFGHANISTAN
http://www.traprockpeace.org/tokyo_trial_13march04.doc
AT TOKYO < 2004 >
THE PEOPLE
Versus GEORGE WALKER BUSH
President of the United States of America
Present: Presiding Judge Professor Osamu Niikura( Japan ) , Professor Dr. Asaho Mizushima(Japan ), Professor Dr. R.I .Akroyd (England ),Professor Peter Erlinder,(USA ) Professor Ms. Niloufer Bhagwat ( India ).
Judgement of Professor Ms Niloufer Bhagwat J.
The Prosecution has presented a formidableIndictment against the Defendant, George Walker Bush, President of the UnitedStates and Commander -in-Chief of US military forces for serious crimes ; waging a war of aggression on Afghanistan, war crimes and crimes againsthumanity against the Afghan people,against prisoners of war ; and the use of radioactive depleteduranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people ofAfghanistan ; with serious fall outeffects on the military personnel ofthe United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, inand around the region .
Relevant for the trial, is the profile of the Defendant , electedas the 43rd President of the United States, and sworn in as President in January 2001 ; the year of the military attack onAfghanistan ; after an electionwhich received international focus , inview of the issues involved , resolvedby the Supreme Court. The Defendant's past history, of close association, with the Corporate sectorin the United States of America, has been highlighted in the indictment by the prosecution ,in particular with theOil and Energy sector ; the Defendant formed an oil company, theArbusto Energy Inc in 1978, which wasunsuccessful ; after which Spectrum 7 Energy of Ohio was formed in 1984 with the Defendantas CEO ; thereafter the Defendant was a Consultant to Harken Energy from 1986 , prior to being elected as Governor of Texas in 1994 andre-elected in 1998.
2. Accomplices and Accessories to the Crimes of waging a war of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity .
Inview of the undisputed facts, that apart from the military forces of the UnitedStates ,ordered to be deployed by theDefendant as Commander-in-Chief for thewar on Afghanistan , military forces of other governments were deployedand leading members of thedefendant's administration ,participated in the decision making ; the prosecution has clarified in theindictment , that other members of the Defendant's administration who were aparty to the conspiracy to wage a waron Afghanistan ,and those heads of government who have deployed military forces of their countries to assist in themilitary occupation ; are equally accomplices and accessories to the crimescommitted by the Defendant ; though in this trial it is the Defendant who hasbeen proceeded against .
3. UniversalJurisdiction
The Tribunal being conscious of the basic principle ofjurisprudence that ' no one must be condemned unheard ' , that ' justice must
17.Verdict:
I find the Defendant , George WalkerBush , President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of United StatesArmed Forces guilty –
1. Under Article 2 of the Statute of the InternationalCriminal Tribunal for Afghanistan and under International Criminal Law ,forwaging a war of aggression against Afghanistan and the Afghan people ;
2. Under Article 3, Part I , clause (a) ,(b), (c) ,(d), (f),(g) and Article 3, Part II, clause (a),(b),(c)(d),(e),(f),(h)(i),(k),(l),(n),(o),(p),(q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunalfor Afghanistan, under International Criminal Law and InternationalHumanitarian Law , in respect of War Crimes committed against the people ofAfghanistan by the use of weapons prohibited by the laws of warfare causingdeath and destruction to the Afghan people ; maiming men , women and children;
3. Under Article 4 , clause (a) ,(b),(d),(e),(f) ,(h) and (i ) of the Statute of the International CriminalTribunal and International HumanitarianLaw , for Crimes Against Humanity committed against the people of Afghanistan;resulting in inhumane acts affecting large sections of the population cause bythe military invasion , bombing , and lack of humanitarian relief ;
4. Under Article 3, Part I , clause(a),(b),(c),(f),(g) and Article 3 ,Part II clause (f),(k),(p), and (q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan , underInternational Criminal Law and theHague Convention and Geneva Convention (III ) of 1949 in respect of the tortureand killings of Talban and other prisoners of war who had surrendered and their torture and inhumane conditions ofdetention and deportation of innocent civilians;
Inrespect of the transport of prisoners in sealed Containers and their death due to suffocation and filing ofrifle shots at the Container for creating holes for ventilation with theprisoners inside ; and for conditionsat Sheberghan prison; the Defendant is entitled to benefit of doubt at thistrial however the issues are left open for trial, before any other court /Tribunal ; as the evidence before theTribunal is not conclusive on the involvement of United States forces ;
5. Under Article 3, Part I (c ) and ( g );Article 3 Part 2 ( a), (b) ,(c) ,(d) ( e) (h) ( i) ( l) and Article 4(b) ,(l) of (n) ,( p),(q) of the ICTA in respect of the serious humanitariansituation resulting from the refugeeexodus in Afghanistan due to thebombing of civilian population andcivilian infrastructure in a country already affected by serious famine resulting in mass exodus of people and deathfrom bombing , hunger ,displacement, disease ; and absence of humanitarian relief ;
6. Under Article 3 , Part II ,clause(o) (p) and under Article 4 clause (a) ,(b) and (l)of the statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan , and under InternationalCriminal Law and International Humanitarian Law ; in respect of the DU weaponsused on the people of Afghanistan to exterminate the population ; and for thecrime of “Omnicide “ the extermination of life , contamination of air ,water and food resources ; and the irreversible alteration of thegenetic code of all living organismsincluding plant life ; as a directconsequence of the use of radioactivemunitions in Afghanistan ; affectingcountries in the entire region ;
7. Under Article 3, Part II ,clause(o) (p) and underArticle 4(a) and ( i) of the Statute ofthe International Tribunal forAfghanistan , under International Criminal Law , for exposing soldiers andother personnel of the United States ,UK and other soldiers of coalition forces to radioactive contamination by the use of DU weapons , hazardingtheir lives, their physiology , and that of their future progeny by irreversible alteration of the genetic code .
18. Direction :
1.The Defendant is a convicted warcriminal consequently unfit to holdpublic office ; citizens ,soldiers andall civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operationfrom the Defendant and hisgovernment ; and in declining to obey illegal orders of the Defendant and his administration ;including militaryorders threatening other nations or the people of the United States on the basis of the Nuremberg Principle,that illegal orders of Superior mustnot be obeyed.
19. Recommendations :
A.Immediatecessation of the use of Depted Uranium Munitions-Moratorium on production ,stockpiling and munufacture .
i. It has beenconclusively proved that DU Weapons are Radioactive , Omnicidal nuclear weapons(the by product of the uranium enrichment process of manufacture of nuclear weapons and nuclearfuel ) used as weapons of "silent genocide" in Afghanistan,Iraq andthe Balkans and destructive of all lifeon earth ; irreversibly altering the genetic code of all exposed .The manufacture , stockpiling and use of suchweapons is strictly prohibited by existing Conventions of International Humanitarian Law and must ceaseimmediately .Corporations producing these weapons , heads of State , heads and personnel of Defense departments ,military officers and others involvedin decisions for its use, are liable to be criminally prosecuted before the International Criminal Court , or within national legal systems , and /or face suitsfor compensation .
ii..The manufacture ,stockpiling, and use of Cluster bombs and Fuel -air explosives also known as Daisy Cutters ,to immediately cease as these weapons systems are also prohibited by existing Conventions of International Humanitarian Law and thosemanufacturing ,purchasing, stockpiling and permitting such weaponsfor military use ; including those using these weapons systems areliable to be prosecuted for war crimes and face liability for claims ofcompensation.
I believe that "Truth" is a weapon on the sideof humanity .If truth is known tyranny and injustice will be defeated . TheTribunal has performed its Judicial task . It is now for people to ensure the implementation of this verdict. .
THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT CAN BE VIEWED AT:
http://www.traprockpeace.org/tokyo_trial_13march04.doc
