: However, assuming that the facts of the report have validity
: and if one subscribes to the NWO train of thought then
: there are several additional concerns that come to mind: 1)
: If enough votes were cast to override a veto then the gag
: order could have been imposed to give the NWO enough time
: to facilitate a situation that would provide them the
: opportunity to suppress the bill in question, i.e., global
: war, national crisis, martial law, etc.
(Which might be why this information is coming out right now instead of sometime later.)
: 2) The events developing in the Middle East, particularly with
: the reported death of Lieberman's relative in the West
: Bank, are poised to trigger a significant global event that
: has the potential for creating massive dissent and
: opposition within the USA. This dissention could trigger
: sufficient civil disobediance (protest and riots) that
: martial law would be warrented.
(Or maybe not. Such world events might be a cover for the transition to Treasury Banks; a large distraction like ones we've seen before, when they wanted us not to notice something else.)
: We must look at all situations as interconnected. Any one
: event could be controlled by civil authorities, however, a
: combination of multiple events could lead to anarchy which
: gives Bill and the boys just what they need to further
: their plans (if you subscribe to the conspiracy theories).
(I don't know who posted it or how "real" it is, but someone recently wrote simply, "Clinton's teeth have been pulled.")
: All of this being said, is the Treasury Bank Bill the straw
: that broke the camels back and forced the NWO to advance
: their agenda? Is the Treasury Bank Bill just a bit to late
: in light of the NWO's consolidation of power and the timing
: of its agenda? Or is the news about the Treasury Bank Bill
: an information plant designed to cause a large portion of
: those who have remained vigilant to drop their guard and
: weaken support for the opposition to the NWO agenda by
: giving false hope to the citizens?
I think it's an astute question, and I don't "know" any more than you do in answer to it. The real key may be in the part of the original post on this topic that refers to something left unsaid, involving something that is to supply the funds for the Treasury Banks.
: In light of the way the story is written, lack of detail of
: its actual passing, the timing of the report, the magnatude
: of impact of the supposed bill, and the overall situation
: gives me a very strong suspition of its validity and more
: importantly its true intended purpose.
I agree. 95% of what we think we know from cyberspace, we don't really know but only "know about". But I think it's also true that if Mr. Clinton or someone were to suddenly announce Treasury Banks and the end of the IRS, without explaining, the suspicion level would be very high, too. I've seen one writer say already, "If you think this business about new Banks and ending IRS is going to be _good_ for us, I have some swamp land I want to show you."
Maybe all we can do is accept that the information has been asserted, and wait and watch for things to prove themselves out, one way or the other.
