Very interesting take Michael. It is the first I have heard of Theosophy actually being labeled "evil" and having a hidden agenda.
Of course I did not mean to imply that Krishnamurti represented Theosophy after 1929, only that he was adopted by them, nurtured, brought up, educated, 'westerized,' and the like. In that sense alone he came "from" them. His teaching was his own and from his own realization and when he announced it it decimated the Theosophists altogether. Although they had grown quite large, after that their numbers and influence dwindled and I thought that was the end of that.
Do you have any links regarding this darker view of the Theosophists? I had always viewed them as rather tame and weird and not particularly influential and certainly not dangerous. Thier doctrines seem like a complicated hodge-podge, hingeing on blind belief, and stressing the occult rather than the higher spiritual. Could such an odd, unaccepted and mostly ignored group be "the most deadly parasitic organisation preparing the way for the NWO?" It's a fascinating viewpoint i'd like to explore a bit.
One would have to investigate Madame Blavatsky I guess and examine her connections. I always regarded her as kind of a "real character," smoking her cigars and faking various "ghost" type phenomena, not particularly spiritual or believable. Then one would have to examine this idea of the alleged Tibetan masters like Dwal Khule who supposedly mastermind the whole organization. Were/are these in fact people or some more ethereal beings or just a big hoax?
I'd like it if you could explain your take on the Theosophists a bit further. The whole thing is a pretty fascinating story.
One thing that was not quite clear in your post:
"That is why Benjamin Creme is talking about someone in 1988 and NOT today in 2003. The man in the photograph, just like K walked away from the Theosophists, because he remained true to the spiritual truth that "Truth is a pathless land."
Do you mean the guy in the picture walked away from Creme's plans, and that now Creme has some new guy lined up? Creme was originally talking about the guy in the picture and now he is talking about somebody else? Who is Creme talking about now? And if the guy in the picture walked away, where is he now?
To bring two guys forward as the world teacher and have both of them walk away would be a real riot! Three strikes anyone?
In a way the Theosophists were an essential ingredient for Krishnamurti's teaching because renouncing the position of "world teacher" and walking away from them was a huge kind of "action-message" in itself. Buddha was a prince who renounced that position but Krishnamurti renounced an even higher position to take his stand for truth only. It's the stuff of legend. His action spoke more than words could ever speak.
