Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Archive
Re: JFK JR.'S PLANE DESTROYED BY 'BIG BANG MACHINE
: JFK Jr.'s plane was destroyed by an explosion. The explosion
: was seen and heard by witnesses on Martha's Vineyard,
: including a reporter for the local paper. The explosion
: came immediately after the plane made radio contact with
: the FAA.
: The close proximity in time between the radio contact and the
: explosion (a matter of seconds) clearly indicates that the
: plane was deliberately targeted. Conceivably a beam weapon
: of some sort could have been used, but more likely an
: on-board bomb was activated by radio control. The quick
: burial at sea of the bodies is also evidence that something
: about the plane and its contents was being hidden.
: The probability that the plane just "happened" to be
: in the way of a beam that was fired for purposes of
: scientific reearch is so negligible that it can be
: dismissed. This "theory" is a fallback position
: whose purposes seem to be (a) to continue to deny that the
: JFK plane was deliberately targeted, and (b) to make the
: people taking this position look like fools.
Ok BxDanny your "theory" has been noted and passed around when the event occured. However I have a few questions. You mentioned that the close proximity of radio contact and the reported explosion indicates deliberate targeting. How do you arrive at that finding? ATC radar knew where he was. The onboard transponder gave a fix to his location.
I have not read what other people said about the anomalous radar return in that area of the event in question. It was very difficult to obtain any for they were all gone! It was 48 hrs. later until we could get any return for that area. Being one who documents this activity, it is no coincedence that a "ring" was present when JFK's plane flew the route of choice.
I personally do not deny that his plane could have been targeted. Since we have no proof of that fateful flight I say "could". I am sorry you feel the way you do when you read other "theories" but they are "theories" because there is no evidence. I would not call you a "fool" for your theory at all. We all have evidence that shows a real good probability of foul play. That there is no question. However what I suggest we do is read everything believe nothing until you can prove it with your own research.
GOD Bless!
