DIVERSIONARY FOOLISHNESS, AND ANOTHER PLAY FOR POWER.
It would appear to make sense on a summary glance, or through the eyes and ears of the court of public opinion, that the budget numbers are what got him out of the job. What makes this correlation way too simplistic and unrealistic, is the core of Barton’s story/position about the shifting of balance of power.
What makes this situation different is that by sitting on, and allowing the Bills of Exchange to be accepted, O’Neill was allowing positive case law and definitive examples to develop that would place the bankers and the “private individual” on the same playing field. That position (one of lessening the grip of government via the money cabal), has INFINITELY more repercussions on the balance of power than the obviously cooked books and ponzi-scheme that is Social Security.
The money cabal will make whatever numbers work that they need to. It has been quite common knowledge for nearly a decade that the financial obligations of the retiring ‘baby boomers’ is mathematically impossible to service under current valuations of our currency. Numerous articles and books have eloquently spelled this out as have numerous posts on this forum.
Keep in mind these projections (44 Trillion) are being biased on the CURRENT value of the fiat Dollar. This same currency has been depreciated by over 30% this past year alone, let alone the COMING massive devaluations that will result from our service economy, backed by the temporary asset value of over-inflated housing values going down the drain (read: depression II). In the next 8 years, a dollar might buy only 5-20% of what it does today – that would lessen the impact of the dollar obligations by an equal percentage (or in the general area). In that circumstance the problem becomes moot.
NO, this matter is about power, who has it, and doing the right thing. The individual who knows what they are doing can use the Bill of Exchange to discharge virtually ANY alleged financial obligation. If O’Neill had been allowed to continue to let these documents/moneies be used in private capacity it would have started an avalanche. The FED and its debt collector would be vaporized.
You may feel free to think whatever you need to, however, nothing in Washington is what it seems to be. And if the “Official” word is that he was ‘fired’ for the budget and report figures, my guess would be that this would be the LAST thing on earth to believe.
Besides look at the source of the leaked information – NOTHING is that easy, unless you have been chipped and/or are addicted to CNN.
