: Also just learned something REALLY interesting from the latest
: Dan Winter article: Intervention (alien help) was
: 'approved' on our behalf BECAUSE so much of our government
: and world has been taken over by a very dark, controlling
: alien presence.
Where's the article? (And what do you make of the kerfuffle involving Tenen and Winter and a bit of Hoaglund?)
: These alien 'craft'(the good guys) arrived on September 18,
: 2001. That would tell me that 911 was really the 'Other'
: side (the 9 (bad) side) saying: 'Go Away! We won't let you
: free them (us) from our grasp!' So much manipulation is
: going on. But at least we are beginning to break out of the
: mold wherein such subjects are simply not discussed!
(Interesting...that's kinda what the much maligned Dove, and Jennifer Lee, have been saying...)
: Right now there is horrendous weather manipulation going on.
: Picked it up at a Nexrad site which has now been closed to
: us...This tells me we were on to something. They had been
: Pulsing the Madrid Fault area and Southeast with some kind
: of HUGE waves. Poor Louisville looked like it was literally
: under attack the other night before the first Alabama
: Quake!
: And Texas! Woe! Then the tornados began. And the rain storms.
: Apparently some of the Southeast is in a pretty bad way,
: even today. Is this more to convince us that PX is on its
: way? I don't know.
And here comes another round. :) At the moment, a patch of serious weather seems to be driving up I-20 from Alabama, maybe to arrive squarely on Atlanta.
: Also, I am noticing that people are beginning to act
: strangely. Have you noticed that? They are becoming
: increasingly illogical and don't seem to notice it. It is
: very odd.
Haven't noticed that as a recent phenomenon - but I find folks who pride themselves on being 'logical' and 'rigorous' in their thinking are the ones most likely to say something wildly illogical with the full force of conviction.
Usually what they're really saying is, "I've seen evidence of the sort I can put my faith in!" - that is, a depth of belief in the validity of the evidence provides the (possibly fallacious) basis for their solid logical conclusions, and they never look back.
They trust the evidence, which is usually of a sort they cannot authenticate for themselves; but they trust the particular process whereby the evidence has come to them.
Why they never see that this is the _same_ as 'religious belief' is beyond me - but they'll defend their logic-process ardently as though it does not include any element of 'faith' at all.
--hobie
