So how are the aircraft controlled (through high Gs just before impact, no less) so precisely into buildings using systems designed to control the aircraft at altitudes and headings and then into landing modes?
We would have to understand the systems as designed (and no doubt flight-tested) first. Then we would have to figure what adaptations – probably on the ground, but possibly within the aircraft themselves – would be required to direct the aircraft precisely into the WTC, and perhaps the Pentagon (We are not sure that the Pentagon was hit by the commercial aircraft . . . but this story suggests there is credible evidence of a high-G turn just before the Pentagon hit. “Military personnel” “calculated” it . . . How did they do that?)
How close will the autopilot get us to an airport landing, and what transition must be made into doing the most automated landing possible? Why can’t the B757 or 767 do an automated landing into WTC? What does an airport have that WTC did not?
I do recall two related stories of interest on the internet. One was mention of some crews having been in the towers that could have been installing some sort of beacon or whatever. The other (I think they were two distinct and separate stories!) was about a scheduled test of electronic landing systems in the New York area that day. I think it was posted by Dick Eastman [has he posted anything on the internet in the last month or two by the way?] and was the story of someone associated with a Chinese company that looked into that test. I grabbed it and reposted two threads about it here at RMN.
I’m almost out of internet time, so I can not research it now.
I can not imagine why NORAD did not have fighter aircraft up quickly to at least have a look and escort the aircraft that were far out of flight plan. It would seem they did not want a fighter pilot looking into the flight deck windows of the hijacked aircraft. Maybe they did not want fighter pilots seeing (or picking up with electronics) other happenings in the sky, like that thing whizzing past the WTC at the time of the second hit, or a possible missile that cratered the WTC building across the street from the big towers.
Was NORAD running this, or were they bamboozled? Carol Valentine www.Public-Action.com says they ran it. But there, we have only one commercial jet hitting (and the first tower and the Pentagon hit by smaller craft (documented). This story has three jumbos hitting the WTC and the Pentagon (undocumented).
Rather than chasing all over the internet trying to figure how B 757 and 767 flight controllers work, I’d go read Carol Valentine’s stories first. NORAD in two parts and Bumbleplanes, as I recall.
There must be quite a number of people, many of them civilians, who know the Boeing flight control systems, including any capability for remote control (if such capability is, in fact, aboard the aircraft in question). My guess is that if we could share the information we might well come to the conclusion that those systems would not provide the precision necessary for the first tower hit and the Pentagon hit. Maybe with modifications we could hope for an off-center hit on the second WTC tower.
I say read (or reread as necessary) Carol Valentine’s work and wait to see if any disinfo gets piled on this story.
Absolutely no criticism of Agent Care intended. Glad it was posted. Made me think.
