Find UFOs, The Apocalypse, New World Order, Political Analysis,
Alternative Health, Armageddon, Conspiracies, Prophecies,
Spirituality, Home Schooling, Home Mortgages and more, in:
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Archive
ABOUT BEAN COUNTING, IMAGINATIVE CLOUDS & THE CO2-SCAM...
Although I have not much time left, let me join you on THIS!
: working for the Austrian government doing carbon accounting.
It should be "Australian" - as I haven't seen any Kangoroos in Austria, except in zoos...
;)
Regarding yor additional points I only want to pick out your latest:
: #4 WAS a sensation a few years back, but had Dave Evans follow
: up on science, he would have known that the cosmic
: ray/cloud theory was not verified and most scientists have
: given up on this theory.
: Fluxon
Yes, because it would have turned out to be unfavourable for the "ZOO-TWO"(CO2) agenda. The theory was state of art after the year 2000 but disappeared very quickly from the public. Here's a rather good piece on that...
By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 1:08am GMT 11/02/2007
...
Scientists say that cosmic rays from outer space play a far greater role in changing the Earth's climate than global warming experts previously thought.
In a book, to be published this week, they claim that fluctuations in the number of cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere directly alter the amount of cloud covering the planet.
How cosmic rays could seed clouds diagram
High levels of cloud cover blankets the Earth and reflects radiated heat from the Sun back out into space, causing the planet to cool.
Henrik Svensmark, a weather scientist at the Danish National Space Centre who led the team behind the research, believes that the planet is experiencing a natural period of low cloud cover due to fewer cosmic rays entering the atmosphere.
This, he says, is responsible for much of the global warming we are experiencing.
He claims carbon dioxide emissions due to human activity are having a smaller impact on climate change than scientists think. If he is correct, it could mean that mankind has more time to reduce our effect on the climate.
...
All this apart from the fact that the electric interaction between Ionosphere and Earth surface (working like a giantic capacitor) isn't found in any of those climate models - not to speak of the zillions of terrabytes on computermemory working on so called "weather-models".
How can you expect some "eggspurts" to predict CLIMATE when they can't even forcast how's the WEATHER's gonna be tomorrow...